2020
DOI: 10.1063/5.0021924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: “Charge measurement of electropsun polyvinylidene fluoride fibers using a custom-made Faraday bucket” [Rev. Sci. Instrum. 91, 075107 (2020)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A custom fabricated Faraday Bucket 30 was used to measure the charge potential of the fiber yarn and membrane samples. The Faraday Bucket and measurement procedures were discussed in the literature 30 .…”
Section: Experimental and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A custom fabricated Faraday Bucket 30 was used to measure the charge potential of the fiber yarn and membrane samples. The Faraday Bucket and measurement procedures were discussed in the literature 30 .…”
Section: Experimental and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A custom fabricated Faraday Bucket 30 was used to measure the charge potential of the fiber yarn and membrane samples. The Faraday Bucket and measurement procedures were discussed in the literature 30 . A few modifications were made to the Faraday bucket to accurately position the sample in and out of the bucket and to directly measure the charge present on the sample using a Keithley 6514 system electrometer (Keithley Instruments, Solon, OH, USA) instead of using a voltmeter.…”
Section: Experimental and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[30,31] Compared to TDTR, [32,33] FDTR setups are inexpensive, simpler to implement, and offer the possibility of characterizing multiple material properties based on their multi-modulation frequency approach. [31,34] Flexibility in the modulation frequency also allows for thermal measurements on samples with a large span of thermal conductivities. [36,37] In the FDTR technique (Figure 1), the sample is covered with a thin metallic transducer layer (gold in this work).…”
Section: Local Thermal Conductivity Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gade et al measured the residual charge amount (Q r ) in the electrospun nonwoven polyvinylidene fluoride fiber mat by a custom-made Faraday cup. [24] However, considering the involvement of the in-process solvent evaporation and the structural formation of random mats for SE-enabled scaffolds, charge measurements for an SE process furnish limited insights into the charge polarity and amount in MEW-enabled scaffolds. In our previous work, the polarity of scaffolds collected on conductive and non-conductive substrates are determined upon approach, indicating an opposite charge polarity between the scaffold printed on conductive and non-conductive substrates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%