2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.89.159901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: Casimir interaction between two magnetic metals in comparison with nonmagnetic test bodies [Phys. Rev. B88, 155410 (2013)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
112
1
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
9
112
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The computations are performed by using (11)- (13) and (7). The dielectric permittivity of Au along the imaginary frequency axis is obtained from the tabulated optical data [61] extrapolated to lower frequencies by means of the Drude or plasma models using the standard procedures [2,3,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. In the configuration of a dielectric film deposited on a Au plate both extrapolations lead to almost coinciding results for the Casimir free energy of a film (up to 0.3%) because the TE reflection coefficient at the boundary surface between a dielectric film and vacuum vanishes at zero frequency.…”
Section: Dielectric Films Deposited On Metallic Platementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The computations are performed by using (11)- (13) and (7). The dielectric permittivity of Au along the imaginary frequency axis is obtained from the tabulated optical data [61] extrapolated to lower frequencies by means of the Drude or plasma models using the standard procedures [2,3,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. In the configuration of a dielectric film deposited on a Au plate both extrapolations lead to almost coinciding results for the Casimir free energy of a film (up to 0.3%) because the TE reflection coefficient at the boundary surface between a dielectric film and vacuum vanishes at zero frequency.…”
Section: Dielectric Films Deposited On Metallic Platementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It must be emphasized that in all precise experiments on measuring the absolute values of the Casimir force [29,30,31,32,33,34,35] (or force gradients) at separations below 1 µm theoretical predictions of the Lifshitz theory using the Drude and the plasma models differ by only a few percent. The difference in theoretical predictions by up to a factor of two is reached only at separations of a few micrometers, where the absolute value of the measured force becomes too small.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[43,44] the gradient of the Casimir force was measured between a Ni-coated hollow glass sphere of R = 61.71 µm radius and ∆ g s = 5 µm thickness and a Ni-coated Si disc. As in the experiments of Refs.…”
Section: Constraints From Experiments With Two Nickel Test Bodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In three experiments performed by means of AFM [40][41][42][43][44] the gradient of the Casimir force was measured between spheres of about 50 µm radius and discs of approximately 5 mm radius made of different materials. Taking into account that the characteristic size of the sphere is by a factor of 100 smaller than that of the disc, all points of the sphere can be considered as situated above the disc center (i.e., the disc area can be considered as infinitely large).…”
Section: Gradient Of the Force Between A Sphere And A Plate Due Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation