1997
DOI: 10.1063/1.474125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: Calculation of nuclear magnetic shieldings. X. Relativistic effects [J. Chem. Phys. 105, 3175 (1996)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
62
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This decomposition is therefore fully consistent with the one carried out in the four-component linear-response calculations 1,2 which considers separately the contributions from electronic and positronic states to a given positive-energy fourcomponent spinor in order to define the paramagnetic and diamagnetic components. The Breit-Pauli approach, in which the magnetic vector potential A is added to the canonical momentum in the Breit-Pauli Hamiltonian, was first investigated by Fukui et al, 17,18 and later expanded and completed by Manninen et al 8 and Fukui et al 18 However, it is interesting to remark the following point. It seems natural to identify the paramagnetic contribution as that originating in operators linear in A, and to identify the diamagnetic one with operators quadratic in A.…”
Section: Formal Relations Connecting Different Approaches To Calculatmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This decomposition is therefore fully consistent with the one carried out in the four-component linear-response calculations 1,2 which considers separately the contributions from electronic and positronic states to a given positive-energy fourcomponent spinor in order to define the paramagnetic and diamagnetic components. The Breit-Pauli approach, in which the magnetic vector potential A is added to the canonical momentum in the Breit-Pauli Hamiltonian, was first investigated by Fukui et al, 17,18 and later expanded and completed by Manninen et al 8 and Fukui et al 18 However, it is interesting to remark the following point. It seems natural to identify the paramagnetic contribution as that originating in operators linear in A, and to identify the diamagnetic one with operators quadratic in A.…”
Section: Formal Relations Connecting Different Approaches To Calculatmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…8,17,21,22 As a consequence, relativistic effects on magnetic properties within the Breit-Pauli approximation can be expressed as first-, second-, and third-order RSPT corrections to the Schrödinger molecular energy.…”
Section: ͑7͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,10 Relativistic spin-orbit ͑SO͒ effects on magnetic molecular properties were thought to be the most important ones until recent calculations of Visscher et al 4 Numerical results for nuclear magnetic shieldings obtained by four-component calculations and their counterpart from RayleighSchrödinger perturbation theory ͑RSPT͒ only match each other for the shielding of heavy atoms X in HX compounds when a new term different from SO is included. The so called mass-correction ͑MC͒ term was proposed for the first time by Fukui et al 6 It was obtained within a formalism in which the external magnetic field is explicitly included in the Breit-Pauli Hamiltonian in order to get a gauge-invariant scheme up to order c Ϫ4 . The MC term is a second order expression containing the Fermi contact ͑FC͒ and the kinetic energy (p 2 ) operators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last few years an ever increasing number of new formalisms and calculations for the evaluation of relativistic effects on molecular properties from four-, two-, or onecomponent response schemes or perturbation theory approaches have been published. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] It was shown that the inclusion of such effects in the calculation of some molecular properties is mandatory when one wants to reproduce experimental trends. 4,10 Relativistic spin-orbit ͑SO͒ effects on magnetic molecular properties were thought to be the most important ones until recent calculations of Visscher et al 4 Numerical results for nuclear magnetic shieldings obtained by four-component calculations and their counterpart from RayleighSchrödinger perturbation theory ͑RSPT͒ only match each other for the shielding of heavy atoms X in HX compounds when a new term different from SO is included.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches can be found in the literature incorporating relativistic effects in the calculation of NMR parameters. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Most of these works are focused on NMSs, while those reporting calculations of SSCs are less abundant. Full fourcomponent calculations were carried out by Visscher et al in the hydrogen halides HX ͑X = F, Cl, Br, and I͒ 13 and by Enevoldsen et al in the tetrahydrides series XH 4 ͑X = C, Si, Ge, Sn, and Pb͒ 9 using the Dirac-Hartree-Fock ͑DHF͒ formalism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%