2003
DOI: 10.1038/nature01221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: An ultra-sparse code underlies the generation of neural sequences in a songbird

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

19
564
2
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 301 publications
(590 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
19
564
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in a quite similar experimental setup the blockage of LTP leads to no significant differences (Zamanillo 1999). Regarding the neural correlate of memory, potential memory items were found, for example, in songbirds during song and recapitulation as stereotypical sequences of spike burst (Hahnloser et al 2002) or during a spatial task, as spatiotemporal patterns (Harris et al 2003) in the hippocampus. Additionally, typical connectivity structures, so-called motifs, were measured in the cortex (Song et al 2005;Perin et al 2011).…”
Section: Links Between Time Scales Of Memory and Physiologymentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, in a quite similar experimental setup the blockage of LTP leads to no significant differences (Zamanillo 1999). Regarding the neural correlate of memory, potential memory items were found, for example, in songbirds during song and recapitulation as stereotypical sequences of spike burst (Hahnloser et al 2002) or during a spatial task, as spatiotemporal patterns (Harris et al 2003) in the hippocampus. Additionally, typical connectivity structures, so-called motifs, were measured in the cortex (Song et al 2005;Perin et al 2011).…”
Section: Links Between Time Scales Of Memory and Physiologymentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Both types of projection neurons generate sparse burst spikes during singing (Hahnloser et al, 2002;Kozhevnikov and Fee, 2007;Prather et al, 2008). In the awake nonsinging state, however, HVC RA neurons are completely inactive (Hahnloser et al, 2002;Kozhevnikov and Fee, 2007;Prather et al, 2008). In contrast, a subpopulation of HVC X neurons exhibits both motor-related activity and auditory re-sponse to the individual bird's own song (BOS) playback and similar songs of other birds .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Therefore, the brain circuits involved in both perception and expression of vocal signals should contain the neurons that transmit syntactic information. In the songbird brain, telencephalic nucleus HVC (used as a proper name) functions in both sensory and motor processing of songs (Nottebohm et al, 1976;Vu et al, 1994;Yu and Margoliash, 1996;Gentner et al, 2000;Hahnloser et al, 2002;Long and Fee, 2008). Hence, analysis of neural activity in Bengalese finch HVC is expected to provide fundamental insights into the neural basis of syntactic organization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, one can argue that even intuitively "infrequent" events do have a physiological effect. Indeed, the frequency of H3-patterns in relation to a behavior is in the range of the rare single spike activity of many neuronal subpopulations, including numerous cortico-cortical, cortico-thalamic, and cortico-striatal projecting populations in mammals [8,9,10,56,60,66,67,68,71], as well as a group of neurons that connect two song-production nuclei in song birds [30]. Although in most of these cases the functional role of such sparse firing is yet to be determined, it seems to be computationally efficient in visual processing [73] and in songs learning in songbirds [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%