1998
DOI: 10.1063/1.476372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: “An assessment of theoretical procedures for the calculation of reliable free radical thermochemistry: A recommended new procedure” [J. Chem. Phys. 108, 604 (1998)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

11
162
1
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
11
162
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context we note, see Table 1, that the available experimental f H 298 values for AN and PY1, 296 and 260 kcal mol −1 , are gratifyingly close to the calculated values, 298 and 260 kcal mol −1 , respectively. In the same vein, the f H 0 value of 100 kcal mol −1 for the severely spin-contaminated radical CH 2 C • -C N (ANR1 in Table 1, <S 2 > = 1.33) is virtually the same as the benchmark value, 100.2 kcal mol −1 , obtained in the elaborate theoretical study of spin-contaminated radicals by Mayer et al [16]. Finally we note that our mechanistic proposals of Scheme 7 remain essentially the same if the energy diagram were based upon the (relative) energies of the CBSB7 component of the method where spin-contamination is not an issue.…”
Section: Computational Aspectssupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this context we note, see Table 1, that the available experimental f H 298 values for AN and PY1, 296 and 260 kcal mol −1 , are gratifyingly close to the calculated values, 298 and 260 kcal mol −1 , respectively. In the same vein, the f H 0 value of 100 kcal mol −1 for the severely spin-contaminated radical CH 2 C • -C N (ANR1 in Table 1, <S 2 > = 1.33) is virtually the same as the benchmark value, 100.2 kcal mol −1 , obtained in the elaborate theoretical study of spin-contaminated radicals by Mayer et al [16]. Finally we note that our mechanistic proposals of Scheme 7 remain essentially the same if the energy diagram were based upon the (relative) energies of the CBSB7 component of the method where spin-contamination is not an issue.…”
Section: Computational Aspectssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…For example, the acrylonitrile ion AN, the pyrimidine ion PY1, the vinylpyrimidine ion VP1 and the dimer ion D1 of Scheme 7 have <S 2 > values of 0.99, 1.29, 1.47 and 0.97, respectively. It is difficult to assess the effect of strong spincontamination on the errors in the CBS-QB3 derived energies but the incorporation of a spin-correction factor and the use of DFT derived geometries are expected to mitigate adverse effects [16]. In this context we note, see Table 1, that the available experimental f H 298 values for AN and PY1, 296 and 260 kcal mol −1 , are gratifyingly close to the calculated values, 298 and 260 kcal mol −1 , respectively.…”
Section: Computational Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for more severely spincontaminated wave functions, they do not give reliable energies. The effect of spin contamination on computed energies is discussed in more detail by Mayer et al 16 In addition, for some of the transition states studied here that are nominally closedshell species, the restricted Hartree-Fock wave function was found to be unstable with respect to becoming unrestricted. In other cases, no transition state was found at the restricted Hartree-Fock level, or one was found that was qualitatively different from those found at higher levels or at the unrestricted Hartree-Fock level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a variant of the CBS-Q method, in which the geometry optimization and frequency calculation are done at the QCISD/6-31G-(d) level of theory, and the larger QCISD energy calculation is replaced by a coupled-cluster (CCSD(T)) calculation. This procedure was shown by Mayer et al 16 to give more accurate energies than the G-2 or CBS-Q methods for spin-contaminated radical species. In the CBS-RAD method, we used unrestricted wave functions for all species, including nominally closed-shell species.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation