2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ERP evidence of early cross-modal links between auditory selective attention and visuo-spatial memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The particular characteristic of this task is that the working memory capacity is solicited by the number of objects to be memorized and by the cross-modal features associated with the stimuli. P1 was found to likely reflect spatially based information shared by the auditory attention and visual memory systems that do not have to be mutually recruited in situations involving cross-modal tasks [97,98] and sensitive to the number of objects rather to the number of features to be memorized [99]. This is also in agreement with our finding, mentioned before, of an improvement in the score of the WAIS-IV digit span after WMT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The particular characteristic of this task is that the working memory capacity is solicited by the number of objects to be memorized and by the cross-modal features associated with the stimuli. P1 was found to likely reflect spatially based information shared by the auditory attention and visual memory systems that do not have to be mutually recruited in situations involving cross-modal tasks [97,98] and sensitive to the number of objects rather to the number of features to be memorized [99]. This is also in agreement with our finding, mentioned before, of an improvement in the score of the WAIS-IV digit span after WMT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, since only dual-task conditions were considered in this experiment, it is unclear if the age-related differences in P3 can be fully attributed to increased load. Other investigations have reported effects of increased task load on the timing of ERPs, specifically delays in P3-related processes (Bomba & Singhal, 2010; Fujiyama, Garry, Martin, & Summers, 2010; Matthews, Garry, Martin, & Summers, 2006). Matthews et al (2006) combined a bimanual motor with a visual task, requiring foot responses to infrequently presented visual target stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It has been reported by Lewald and Guski [7] that the point of subjective simultaneity changes with distance because of temporal disparity, moreover visual field size is influenced by the presence of auditory signals [8] that reduce the focus of attention. Also, there are links between auditory selective attention and visual-spatial representation [9], and it is well known that in crossmodal stimulation the judgement about a stimulus correlates with judgement on the other one even if physically they are uncorrelated [10]. This leads to think that vision is not the dominant sensory modality, self-contained and independent from other senses, many results show that visual perception is strongly altered by other stimuli, as sound or touch [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%