ERP correlates of the bilateral redundancy gain for words

Mohr, Bettina; Endraß, Tanja; Hauk, Olaf; Pulvermüller, Friedemann

doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.01.015

Cited by 32 publications

(46 citation statements)

References 59 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The other relevant finding has to do with the bilateral redundancy gain effect. In control participants from other studies, accuracy is found to be better and response times are similar (Mohr et al, 2000) or faster (Mohr et al, 2007) for trials presented bilaterally as compared to unilaterally presented trials. These results were replicated here in that both groups were more accurate in responding to bilaterally presented trials, and that control participants did not differ in mean response times to both kinds of trials.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 64%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Hemispheric and executive influences on low-level language processing after traumatic brain injury

Russell

Arenth

Scanlon³

et al. 2012

Brain Injury

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 64%

“…In studies like the current one, healthy controls typically show a benefit of greater accuracy and in some cases also faster response times for trials which are presented bilaterally (e.g., Hasbrooke & Chiarello, 1998;Mohr, Endrass, Hauk, & Pulvermüller, 2007;Mohr, Pulvermüller, Cohen, & Rockstroh, 2000).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 67%

Hemispheric and executive influences on low-level language processing after traumatic brain injury

Russell

Arenth

Scanlon³

et al. 2012

Brain Injury

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…This phenomenon is well established (e.g., Todd, 1912) and has been reported in a wide range of experimental paradigms (e.g., Koene & Zhaoping, 2007;Mohr, Endrass, Hauk, & Pulvermuller, 2007;Schroter, Ulrich, & Miller, 2007;Gondan, Lange, Rösler, & Röder, 2004;Iacoboni & Zaidel, 2003;Forster, Cavina-Pratesi, Aglioto, & Berlucchi, 2002;Lamarre, Busby, & Spidalieri, 1983). These paradigms can be classified along several criteria: (a) spatial origin of the signals (same or different locations), (b) modality of the signals (visual, auditory, or haptic), (c) number of relevant modalities (one or two), and (d) depth of signal processing necessary to determine the appropriate motor response (onset, feature contrast, or target identity).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 60%

Perceptual Basis of Redundancy Gains in Visual Pop-out Search

Töllner

Zehetleitner

Krummenacher

et al. 2011

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract■ The redundant-signals effect (RSE) refers to a speed-up of RT when the response is triggered by two, rather than just one, response-relevant target elements. Although there is agreement that in the visual modality RSEs observed with dimensionally redundant signals originating from the same location are generated by coactive processing architectures, there has been a debate as to the exact stage(s)-preattentive versus postselective-of processing at which coactivation arises. To determine the origin(s) of redundancy gains in visual pop-out search, the present study combined mental chronometry with electrophysiological markers that reflect purely preattentive perceptual (posteriorcontralateral negativity [PCN]), preattentive and postselective perceptual plus response selection-related (stimulus-locked lateralized readiness potential [LRP]), or purely response productionrelated processes (response-locked LRP). As expected, there was an RSE on target detection RTs, with evidence for coactivation. At the electrophysiological level, this pattern was mirrored by an RSE in PCN latencies, whereas stimulus-locked LRP latencies showed no RSE over and above the PCN effect. Also, there was no RSE on the response-locked LRPs. This pattern demonstrates a major contribution of preattentive perceptual processing stages to the RSE in visual pop-out search, consistent with parallel-

show abstract

“…Another method to remove ocular artifacts is the multiple source eye correction (MSEC) method [77], in which the eye activity is estimated (and later corrected) according to both the spatial distribution of eye activity and a model of brain activity. The MSEC method is now widely used (e.g., [78][79][80]). …”

Section: Controlling Electrode Impedancementioning

confidence: 99%

An introduction to the measurement of auditory event-related potentials (ERPs)

Remijn

Hasuo

Fujihira

et al. 2014

Acoust. Sci. & Tech.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In 1939, Pauline Davis reported the first study on event-related potentials (ERPs) performed on awake humans. ERPs are time-locked brain potentials that occur in response to cognitive, motor or perceptual events. The events used by Davis were sounds, and in the decades that followed her landmark study ERP research significantly contributed to the knowledge of auditory perception and neurophysiology we have today. ERPs are very well suited to study neural responses to sound stimuli, since the researcher can monitor the brain's registration of sound edges and spectral changes in sound on a millisecond-by-millisecond basis. In this overview we will introduce basic concepts of auditory ERP research. The overview includes descriptions of typical ERP components, experimental paradigms, sound stimuli, research methodology, and ways to analyze data.

show abstract

ERP correlates of the bilateral redundancy gain for words

Cited by 32 publications

References 59 publications

Hemispheric and executive influences on low-level language processing after traumatic brain injury

Hemispheric and executive influences on low-level language processing after traumatic brain injury

Perceptual Basis of Redundancy Gains in Visual Pop-out Search

An introduction to the measurement of auditory event-related potentials (ERPs)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About