1985
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(1985)111:10(1308)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erosion of Soft Cohesive Sediment Deposits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
211
1
5

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 396 publications
(226 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
7
211
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Black et al [2002] has listed some of the biological effects that can affect sediment erosion. Other works have mentioned the impact of chemical factors [Parchure and Mehta, 1985;Ravisangar et al, 2001] or unsaturation on erosion. We particularly focus on particle interaction for saturated conditions: matric suction effects need not to be taken into account.…”
Section: Cohesion Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Black et al [2002] has listed some of the biological effects that can affect sediment erosion. Other works have mentioned the impact of chemical factors [Parchure and Mehta, 1985;Ravisangar et al, 2001] or unsaturation on erosion. We particularly focus on particle interaction for saturated conditions: matric suction effects need not to be taken into account.…”
Section: Cohesion Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The erosion and transport of sediments is a key problem for many fields, both in nature and industry, such as in the coastal engineering regarding the prediction of estuary and river bed evolution [21,35], or in the civil engineering concerning the safety of embankment dams and dikes [12,13]. Within this latter context of great social relevance, there are statistical estimates [22] showing that surface erosion, which generally results from an overflowing of the earthwork, causes about 50% of the embankment dam and levee failures whereas a slightly smaller proportion can be attributed to internal erosion induced by water infiltration through the embankment or its foundation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, τ Cr commonly increases with depth due to the effects of consolidation, thereby limiting the extent of erosion under a given bed shear stress. The erosion behavior under such conditions is referred to as depth-limited or type I erosion (Mehta and Partheniades 1982) and can be formulated as (Parchure and Mehta 1985;Amos et al 1992) E ¼ E f exp ∝ τ b −τ Cr;z τ Cr;z ! β 8 < :…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation (1) and its variants have been implemented in numerical sediment transport models for numerous applications around the world. Such applications typically rely on either parameterization derived from physical measurements of the erosion properties, achieved using a number of different devices and approaches such as the Gust microcosm (Gust and Mueller 1997), Sedflume (McNeil et al 1996), carousels (Parchure and Mehta 1985;Amos et al 1992;Maa et al 1993), soil mechanical properties (Winterwerp et al 2012), etc., or rely on model calibration to suspended sediment concentration (SSC) measurements (Van Kessel et al 2011;Van Maren et al 2015). The experimental methods vary in complexity in terms of sample requirements (for example, undisturbed cores versus grab samples), ex situ versus in situ measurements, laboratory equipment (for example, specialized flumes versus conventional soil mechanical measurements), sediment strata sampled (for example, thin layers near the bed surface versus larger depth intervals but deeper in the bed), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%