2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.gr.2018.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erosion at extended continental margins: Insights from new aerogeophysical data in eastern Dronning Maud Land

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eagles et al. (2018) showed that there was also clearly activity linked to passive margin development and erosion that occurred inland of the mountains.…”
Section: Te Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Eagles et al. (2018) showed that there was also clearly activity linked to passive margin development and erosion that occurred inland of the mountains.…”
Section: Te Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the Forster magnetic anomaly (Riedel et al, 2013) and the Gamburtsev Suture (Ferraccioli et al, 2011). However, the present-day mountains are unlikely to be that old (e.g., Paxman et al, 2016) so the Sirevaag et al (2018) and Eagles et al (2018) scenarios seem preferable.…”
Section: T E Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By relying on this spread in rate factors and by accounting for a possible spread in ice thicknesses around the ca. 1000 m thickness obtained from a few airborne flight lines (Eagles et al, 2018) (see Section 5), depth-averaged velocities in the order of 0.4-12 m a À1 are typically expected over the Nansen ice field (Fig. C.1).…”
Section: Appendix C Ice Dynamic 1-d Flowline Modelmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, the use of a 3-D ice flow model is not justified here, as various boundary conditions have large uncertainties. The best estimates on the regional ice thickness are from the BEDMAP2 dataset (Fretwell et al, 2013), and recently performed airborne radar measurements of ice thickness over parts of the ice field and its surroundings (Eagles et al, 2018). These datasets suggest that the local ice thickness is typically in the order of 1000 m around the ice field (see e.g.…”
Section: Regional Ice Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%