2017
DOI: 10.9775/kvfd.2016.16359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erkek Hemşin Koyununda Glandula İnterdigitalis’in Morfolojik ve Morfometrik Yapısı ile Arterial Vaskularizasyonu

Abstract: Citation of This ArticleGürbüz İ, Demiraslan Y, Karadağ Sarı E, Aslan K: Morphologic and morphometric structure and arterial vascularization of glandula interdigitalis in male Hemshin sheep. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 23 (2): 241-246, 2017. DOI: 10.9775/kvfd.2016 AbstractThe purpose of this study was to determine morphologic and morphometric structure and arterial vascularization of glandula interdigitalis in male Hemshin sheep. In the study, 40 feet (20 fore-feet, 20 hind-feet) were used as material. Latex wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In South Karaman sheep, duct length was reported as 23.18 ± 0.71 and 21.21 ± 1.13 mm in the forelimbs and hind limbs, respectively respectively (Yılmaz et al, 2017). In male Hemshin sheep, the same lengths were reported as 20.90 ± 1.95, 18.95 ± 1.50, 4.60 ± 0.53 and 3.05 ± 0.47 mm in the forelimbs and hind limbs, respectively (Gürbüz et al, 2017). In our study, canal length and diameter were determined as 22.39 ± 0.49, 4.48 ± 0.12, 24.64 ± 0.67 and 4.75 ± 0.14 mm in the forelimbs and hind limbs, respectively.…”
Section: Piresmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In South Karaman sheep, duct length was reported as 23.18 ± 0.71 and 21.21 ± 1.13 mm in the forelimbs and hind limbs, respectively respectively (Yılmaz et al, 2017). In male Hemshin sheep, the same lengths were reported as 20.90 ± 1.95, 18.95 ± 1.50, 4.60 ± 0.53 and 3.05 ± 0.47 mm in the forelimbs and hind limbs, respectively (Gürbüz et al, 2017). In our study, canal length and diameter were determined as 22.39 ± 0.49, 4.48 ± 0.12, 24.64 ± 0.67 and 4.75 ± 0.14 mm in the forelimbs and hind limbs, respectively.…”
Section: Piresmentioning
confidence: 95%