Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Almost half of the bicameral legislatures in the Commonwealth are located in the Commonwealth Caribbean. Why so many bicameral legislatures are located in a relatively small geographic region, which is composed of countries that manifest characteristics more usually associated with unicameralism-small size, a unitary state, and homogeneity-is puzzling. Scholars have offered two possible explanations. The first concerns the presumed wish of the region's political leaders upon independence to replicate the values and institutions of their colonial mentor, Britain. The second concerns the presumed need to prevent one-party dominance by guaranteeing the representation of opposition parties in the second chamber. This paper challenges both these explanations. By examining the origins of bicameralism in the region with the arrival of the first settlers in the seventeenth century, its demise during the era of crown colony rule in the nineteenth century, its renaissance in the 1950s and 1960s, and its survival in the post-independence era this paper will offer a more multi-layered explanation This entails taking account of the complex relationship between these former colonies and their imperial past, the wide range of views expressed both locally and within the Colonial Office about the suitability of bicameralism in the debates that accompanied the transition from colonial rule to independence, and, finally, the very distinctive nature of Caribbean bicameralism. Almost half of the bicameral legislatures in the Commonwealth are located in one, relatively small, geographic region-the Commonwealth Caribbean. While this is in itself a striking statistic, what makes it even more striking is that most of these countries manifest characteristics which are more traditionally associated with unicameralism: small size,1 homogeneity,2 and limited resources.3 Moreover, the majority of these countries attained their independence in the 1960s and 1970s; a period when second chambers were being castigated in progressive circles as 'redundant, reactionary or undemocratic.'4 The prevalence of bicameralism in the Commonwealth Caribbean-with eight out of the 12 independent countries in the region having second chamberstherefore requires some explanation.5 The one usually offered by scholars is that at the time of independence these countries were simply seeking to replicate the values and institutions of their colonial mentor, Britain, and its second chamber,
Almost half of the bicameral legislatures in the Commonwealth are located in the Commonwealth Caribbean. Why so many bicameral legislatures are located in a relatively small geographic region, which is composed of countries that manifest characteristics more usually associated with unicameralism-small size, a unitary state, and homogeneity-is puzzling. Scholars have offered two possible explanations. The first concerns the presumed wish of the region's political leaders upon independence to replicate the values and institutions of their colonial mentor, Britain. The second concerns the presumed need to prevent one-party dominance by guaranteeing the representation of opposition parties in the second chamber. This paper challenges both these explanations. By examining the origins of bicameralism in the region with the arrival of the first settlers in the seventeenth century, its demise during the era of crown colony rule in the nineteenth century, its renaissance in the 1950s and 1960s, and its survival in the post-independence era this paper will offer a more multi-layered explanation This entails taking account of the complex relationship between these former colonies and their imperial past, the wide range of views expressed both locally and within the Colonial Office about the suitability of bicameralism in the debates that accompanied the transition from colonial rule to independence, and, finally, the very distinctive nature of Caribbean bicameralism. Almost half of the bicameral legislatures in the Commonwealth are located in one, relatively small, geographic region-the Commonwealth Caribbean. While this is in itself a striking statistic, what makes it even more striking is that most of these countries manifest characteristics which are more traditionally associated with unicameralism: small size,1 homogeneity,2 and limited resources.3 Moreover, the majority of these countries attained their independence in the 1960s and 1970s; a period when second chambers were being castigated in progressive circles as 'redundant, reactionary or undemocratic.'4 The prevalence of bicameralism in the Commonwealth Caribbean-with eight out of the 12 independent countries in the region having second chamberstherefore requires some explanation.5 The one usually offered by scholars is that at the time of independence these countries were simply seeking to replicate the values and institutions of their colonial mentor, Britain, and its second chamber,
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.