2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-8141(02)00102-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ergonomic intervention on neck, shoulder and arm symptoms of newspaper employees in work with visual display units

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Supporting the forearm during computer work has been previously recommended as it promotes stability of the upper body with less strain on thoracic muscles such as trapezius, deltoid, and extensor digitorum (recorded using electromyography) (Delisle et al, 2006;Karlqvist, 1998;Nevala-Puranen et al, 2003;Saarni et al, 2007). However, in terms of postural benefit, the findings of this study support the previous literature in that forearm supported posture potentially promotes a more stooped head and shoulder posture (Bendix et al, 1985;Zacharkow, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Supporting the forearm during computer work has been previously recommended as it promotes stability of the upper body with less strain on thoracic muscles such as trapezius, deltoid, and extensor digitorum (recorded using electromyography) (Delisle et al, 2006;Karlqvist, 1998;Nevala-Puranen et al, 2003;Saarni et al, 2007). However, in terms of postural benefit, the findings of this study support the previous literature in that forearm supported posture potentially promotes a more stooped head and shoulder posture (Bendix et al, 1985;Zacharkow, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This is somewhat in contrast to Chapter 6, where cultural differences in depression and anxiety symptoms appeared to be explained by other factors such as job strain and coping resources. These contrasting findings overall suggest that future studies will need to consider the potential effect of cultural differences when making inferences about findings observed in just one culture.Several ergonomic factors impacted on the maintenance of neutral posture in office workers.Interestingly the majority of participants (67.9%) in this study postured their forearms such that they were supported on the desk top while working with the mouse or keyboard.Supporting the forearm during computer work has been previously recommended as it promotes stability of the upper body with less strain on thoracic muscles such as trapezius, deltoid, and extensor digitorum (recorded using electromyography) (Delisle et al, 2006;Karlqvist, 1998;Nevala-Puranen et al, 2003;Saarni et al, 2007). However, in terms of postural benefit, the findings of this study support the previous literature in that forearm supported posture potentially promotes a more stooped head and shoulder posture (Bendix et al, 1985;Zacharkow, 1988).…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…All seven variables which associated significantly with neck pain in bivariate analysis by using Chi square test entered in the logistic regression. The significant predictors of neck pain in this model after control of confounders were (30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39) and (40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49) …”
Section: Multivariate Analysismentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In bivariate; Chi square analysis, the result of present study indicated that there were seven factors significantly associated with neck pain i.e. age, BMI, physical exercises, night shifts, neck bending, prolonged working hours on computer and personnel shortage.Further analysis, by using multiple logistic regression showed that age groups [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]) and [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] physical exercises (p= 0.025,, working time on computer (p= 0.029, night shifts (p= 0.001, personnel shortage (p= 0.005, and neck bending (p= 0.013, …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, according to the results of our study, this represents change in the system away from coercion towards one which encourages voluntary action, i.e., Näppärä. There is a great demand for (a) new methods using techniques which assess physical exposure to workrelated musculo skeletal risks and (b) practical exposure assessment tools that meet the needs of ergonomics experts and practitioners [17,18,19,20,21]. Moreover, Näppärä can be used by both OHC professionals and computer operators.…”
Section: Object Of Observationmentioning
confidence: 99%