2018
DOI: 10.1177/1541931218621317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ergonomic Evaluation of a Driverless Pod Design

Abstract: A driverless last mile mobility vehicle design, developed based on a theoretical comfort model and user feedback from focus groups, was evaluated with the aid of an ergonomic buck. The evaluation focused on the physical interaction with the interior, analysis of movements within the vehicle cabin, overall cabin dimensions and usability. The trial also demonstrated that a wheelchair user can access the vehicle whilst three seated passengers are present and will have sufficient space in the interior.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the steering wheel takes up a considerable part of the area in which the motions are performed. Wasser et al (Wasser et al 2018) conduct an ergonomic evaluation with a mock-up of an autonomous car. They use a questionnaire to collect data, but they do not include boarding.…”
Section: Iced21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the steering wheel takes up a considerable part of the area in which the motions are performed. Wasser et al (Wasser et al 2018) conduct an ergonomic evaluation with a mock-up of an autonomous car. They use a questionnaire to collect data, but they do not include boarding.…”
Section: Iced21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing studies have explored the inclusion of older and disabled people in the design of SAVs [1][2][3]6], and used participatory design methods to explore specific needs of excluded groups [5] and full scale SAV mock-ups to test accessibility of SAVs with disabled people [12,14]. Despite these efforts to address the needs of individual excluded groups, it is important to explore how the needs of multiple excluded groups can be met by identifying common areas of exclusion and developing solutions which address these areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%