2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ergonomic analysis of the dimension of a precision tool handle: a case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The novice uses inappropriate grip forces in these strategic finger-hand regions, producing either excessive or insufficient force at the critical sensor locations. The grip force profiles are consistent with anatomical data relative to the evolution of strategic use of functionally specific finger and hand regions for grip and grip force control in manually executed precision tasks [17][18][19][20]. Preconceptions that grip forces may be universally stronger in the dominant hand [18] require a reconsideration in the light of the grip force profiles from this study, which show that the level of expertise and task-device specific factors determine the total amount of grip force deployed by either the dominant or the nondominant hand.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The novice uses inappropriate grip forces in these strategic finger-hand regions, producing either excessive or insufficient force at the critical sensor locations. The grip force profiles are consistent with anatomical data relative to the evolution of strategic use of functionally specific finger and hand regions for grip and grip force control in manually executed precision tasks [17][18][19][20]. Preconceptions that grip forces may be universally stronger in the dominant hand [18] require a reconsideration in the light of the grip force profiles from this study, which show that the level of expertise and task-device specific factors determine the total amount of grip force deployed by either the dominant or the nondominant hand.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Sensor S5 was positioned on the middle phalanx of the middle finger, critical for strong grip force control, sensor S6 on the middle phalanx of the ring finger, contributes to force modulation less critical for strong grip control, sensor S7 on the middle phalanx of the small finger (pinky) highly critical for subtle, finely tuned grip force control. Experts like surgeons use their pinkies strategically for the fine-tuning of hand-tool interactions [17,19,20]. Sensor S10 was positioned on the metacarpal that joins the thumb to the wrist, important in general grip control (getting hold of the device handles), but not critical for subtle strategic grip force control [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The state of the art in experimental studies on grip force control for lifting and manipulating objects [88,89,91,93,94] provides insight into the contributions of each finger to overall grip strength and fine grip force control. The middle finger, for example, has evolved to become the most important contributor to gross total grip force and, therefore, is most important for getting a good grip of heavy objects to lift or carry, while the ring finger and the small (pinky) finger have evolved for the fine control of subtle grip force modulations, which is important in precision tasks [102][103][104][105][106]. Human grip force is governed by self-organizing prehensile synergies [91,92] that involve from-local-to-global functional interactions (property 6) between sensory (low-level) and central (high-level) representations in the somatosensory brain.…”
Section: Seven Properties Of Self-organization In a Somatosensory Neumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While current multi-modal feed-back systems may represent a slight advantage over the not very effective traditional single modality feedback solutions by achieving average grip forces closer to those normally possible with the human hand, the monitoring of individual grip forces of the surgeon (or trainee) during task execution by wearable multisensory systems is by far the superior solution. Real-time grip force sensing by wearable systems can directly help prevent incidents, because it includes the possibility of sending a signal (sound or light) to the operator or surgeon whenever his/her grip force exceeds a critical limit before the damage is done [24][25][26][27][28][29]. Proficiency, or expertise, in the control of a robotic master/slave system designed for minimally invasive surgery is reflected by a lesser grip force during task execution as well as by shorter task execution times [21,22,25,27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%