2017
DOI: 10.1088/2058-9565/aa5d00
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ergodicity in randomly perturbed quantum systems

Abstract: The theoretical cornerstone of statistical mechanics is the ergodic assumption, i.e. the assumption that the time average of an observable equals its ensemble average. Here, we show how such a property is present when an open quantum system is continuously perturbed by an external environment effectively observing the system at random times while the system dynamics approaches the quantum Zeno regime. In this context, by large deviation theory we analytically show how the most probable value of the probability… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(86 reference statements)
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we have already named three main contributions in the beginning of this section. If we ignore for a moment errors (ii) and (iii) and focus on (i), we can make the following considerations concerning the possible breaking of the ergodic hypothesis of the system-environment interaction modes [33]. In this regard, if the duration t N of the single experiment is long enough to effectively reduce the stochasticity due to error (i), then one could just find, also experimentally, that ln 2 P cn ≈ ln 2 P cn .…”
Section: Ergodic Hypothesis and Experimental Error Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we have already named three main contributions in the beginning of this section. If we ignore for a moment errors (ii) and (iii) and focus on (i), we can make the following considerations concerning the possible breaking of the ergodic hypothesis of the system-environment interaction modes [33]. In this regard, if the duration t N of the single experiment is long enough to effectively reduce the stochasticity due to error (i), then one could just find, also experimentally, that ln 2 P cn ≈ ln 2 P cn .…”
Section: Ergodic Hypothesis and Experimental Error Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, is set to unity and τ α ≡ t α − t α−1 . We also assume that, in accordance with the recently introduced stochastic quantum Zeno phenomena [5,6,33], there exists for each propagator U α at least one dynamical parameter λ, that is a fluctuating variable. For example, one could consider as in [38,39] that each λ α is equal to the time interval τ α , with τ α random.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, repeated quantum measurements could correspond to a process exchanging photons with the environment [11] or could be adopted to ensure the protection of coherent evolutions of a quantum system by decoherence (quantum Zeno dynamics) [12]. Experimentally, together with strong coupling methods, such dynamics have been realized in several physical setups such as solid-state spins, superconducting qubits or ultracold atomic gases [5,[13][14][15][16][17]. They are also relevant in quantum metrology [18] to probe the phase evolution of an atomic ensemble by means of interleaved interrogations and feedback corrections [19,20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, sequences of Zeno measurements have been studied in the presence of additional stochastic contributions to analyze how the confinement probability of the system to remain in the measured subspace changes with the amount and type of stochasticity [36][37][38]. Such a regime is called weak quantum Zeno (WQZ) and it has been observed that, although projective measurements could constantly monitor a quantum system, its decay is boosted by the presence of disorder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%