2005
DOI: 10.1021/ci050457y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ErG:  2D Pharmacophore Descriptions for Scaffold Hopping

Abstract: An extended reduced graph approach (ErG) is presented that uses pharmacophore-type node descriptions to encode the relevant molecular properties. The basic idea of the method can be described as a hybrid approach of reduced graphs (Gillet et al. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 338-345) and binding property pairs (Kearsley et al. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 118-127). However, specific extension modifications to correctly describe the pharmacophoric properties, size, and shape of the molecules unde… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
154
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
154
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The substituents can be specific substructures, such as methyl or ethyl, or they can be defined using generic nomenclature, Since 2002, the Sheffield group has investigated the use of reduced graphs in a number of applications including similarity searching, analysis of HTS data, clustering and identification of structure-activity relationships. Our approach to representing structures as reduced graphs is close in concept to the Feature Trees developed by Rarey et al [47] and the ErGs presented by Steifl et al [48] Gillet et al…”
Section: Reduced Graphsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The substituents can be specific substructures, such as methyl or ethyl, or they can be defined using generic nomenclature, Since 2002, the Sheffield group has investigated the use of reduced graphs in a number of applications including similarity searching, analysis of HTS data, clustering and identification of structure-activity relationships. Our approach to representing structures as reduced graphs is close in concept to the Feature Trees developed by Rarey et al [47] and the ErGs presented by Steifl et al [48] Gillet et al…”
Section: Reduced Graphsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Using the Best-Sum retrieval strategy (described in section 5.1.1) for the query q, the first compound retrieved is again c 6 . This compound is added to the set A and removed from the database.…”
Section: 14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scaffold-hopping performance of a method is then evaluated by identifying how many active compounds from different clusters (structural classes) are obtained. 6 The assumption in this approach is that compounds with different scaffolds are more likely to be in different clusters and the method that retrieves actives from many different clusters among the top hits is good for scaffold-hopping. This evaluation strategy has the drawback that using global clustering masks the local effects and the final clusters depend on clustering parameters.…”
Section: Definition Of Scaffold-hopping Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recognise the substantial efforts made by other groups in related methods, most notably the feature trees approach by Rarey et al (1,2) and the extended reduced graph, ErG, by Stiefl et al (3,4), however, these are not discussed in detail for reasons of brevity. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%