2014
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1387721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erfassung körperlicher Aktivität mittels ­Akzelerometrie – Möglichkeiten und Grenzen aus technischer Sicht

Abstract: Zusammenfassung In den vergangenen Jahren ist die Notwendigkeit, k?rperliche Aktivit?t objektiv zu erfassen, deutlich geworden, da diese bei einer Reihe der bedeutendsten Volkskrankheiten eine entscheidende Rolle f?r die Entstehung sowie bei der Therapie spielt. Aktivit?tsmonitore, die auf Beschleunigungssensoren basieren und verschiedene Parameter erfassen k?nnen, haben sich in den letzten Jahren zum Standardinstrument bei der objektiven Messung der k?rperlichen Aktivit?t entwickelt. Der grundlegende Paramete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accelerometer continuously assesses data regarding participants’ acceleration in all three geometric axes, context temperature and air pressure. 79 This will allow to examine individual levels of physical activity and energy expenditure during the ambulatory assessment period.…”
Section: Methods and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accelerometer continuously assesses data regarding participants’ acceleration in all three geometric axes, context temperature and air pressure. 79 This will allow to examine individual levels of physical activity and energy expenditure during the ambulatory assessment period.…”
Section: Methods and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different studies have shown the significant and partly heavy underestimation (30-50%) of EE of walking upstairs or uphill [5,7,11] as well as overestimation of walking downhill (up to 50%) [6,12]. According to Hey et al, this non-linear coherence between acceleration data and energy expenditure leads to inadequate results [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accelerometers are the most commonly used wearable devices to quantify everyday life motor activity in clinical trials and clinical practice [ 6 , 7 ]. Conventional outcome measures of accelerometers are activity counts as well as intensity levels and energy expenditure estimations based on cut-points of these counts [ 8 ]. These measures provide relevant information about whole-body physical activity, but they are non-specific and cannot determine movement patterns and types of activities performed [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%