2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erectile Function Outcome Reporting After Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment

Abstract: Clinical studies reporting erectile function outcomes after localized prostate cancer treatment often demonstrate poorly interpretable and inconsistent manners of assessment as well as widely disparate rates of erectile dysfunction and erectile function. Future studies must apply scientifically rigorous methodology and standard outcomes measures to advance this field of study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
117
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
117
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…17 Various studies have reported erectile function outcomes after radical prostatectomy, 18 brachytherapy, 19 or external-beam radiotherapy with or without brachytherapy 20,21 using the IIEF-5. Many more studies have used the EPIC to assess ED in prostate cancer patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Various studies have reported erectile function outcomes after radical prostatectomy, 18 brachytherapy, 19 or external-beam radiotherapy with or without brachytherapy 20,21 using the IIEF-5. Many more studies have used the EPIC to assess ED in prostate cancer patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 ED is estimated to affect 26--100% of patients after surgery. 3,4 The main cause of ED after RP is neurogenic, because of intraoperative injury to the neurovascular bundle. 5 However, other mechanisms including arterial trauma and neuropraxia-associated structural alterations in corporal smooth muscle may also have a role.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 The main cause of ED after RP is neurogenic, because of intraoperative injury to the neurovascular bundle.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 The magnitude of RT as a confounding factor is impossible to estimate because we did not have a control group that received RT monotherapy in our study and the post-RT rates of ED reported in the literature vary from 8 to 85%. 26 Among 875 patients in the SPCG-7 study, the proportions of men with physician-reported ED at baseline and at the 5-year follow-up were 33% and 81% in those who received AA monotherapy and 36% and 89% in those who received AA þ RT. 4 These results show that long-term AA treatment, even though applied alone, is associated with severe impairment of sexual function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%