1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0046-8177(96)90145-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erdheim-chester disease: A case report with immunohistochemical and biochemical examination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
29
0
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
29
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial diagnosis (cellular BFH) was reconsidered as non-LCH. The similar immunohistochemical profile in the bone -CD68 (+), CD1a (-) [2] and S100 (slightly positive) [10] -also supported the non-LCH type of bone proliferating histiocytes. The mild and focal positivity of S100 in histiocytes and the absence of emperipolesis in those histiocytes expressing S100 protein rule out the diagnosis of RDD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The initial diagnosis (cellular BFH) was reconsidered as non-LCH. The similar immunohistochemical profile in the bone -CD68 (+), CD1a (-) [2] and S100 (slightly positive) [10] -also supported the non-LCH type of bone proliferating histiocytes. The mild and focal positivity of S100 in histiocytes and the absence of emperipolesis in those histiocytes expressing S100 protein rule out the diagnosis of RDD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The histological changes include tissue infiltration with lipoid granulomas composed of foamy CD68-positive but CD1a-negative macrophages, in contrast to Langerhans cells. These macrophages are also usually negative for S-100 protein but may occasionally be weakly positive [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, much more information is available, and this concept has been hardly challenged. Evidences favoring distinct entities are the age of presentation (children or young adults in LCH against adults or elderly in ECD), the characteristic osteosclerotic symmetrical lesions of ECD as opposed to the frequent osteolytic lesions of LCH, the proliferative index of ECD lesions consistently lower than 3% as opposed to the LCH range (2% to 60%; mean value 10.5% for cytologically typical cases and 22.5% for cytologically atypical cases) [18,20,23,35]. Further, ECD histiocytes are uniformly negative for CD1a antigen, and no Birbeck granule has been demonstrated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histologically, ECD lesions show a cell infiltrate of xanthomatous histiocytes of non-Langerhans-cell lineage (CD68 positive; S100 protein, CD1a and Birbeck granules negative) and fibrosis with an infiltrative pattern [9,10,19,20,23,26]. Histiocytes have no nuclear atypia, and scattered lipid-laden multi-nucleated giant cells of the Touton-type can be found.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Classically, the patients develop symmetric osteosclerotic lesions of the metaphyseal region of long bones with sparing of the flat bones. 1,2,4,5 Lytic bone lesions are present in approximately one-third of cases. 1,2 Typically, bone pain is the most frequent clinical symptom.…”
Section: Sommairementioning
confidence: 99%