2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-32094-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erasure conversion for fault-tolerant quantum computing in alkaline earth Rydberg atom arrays

Abstract: Executing quantum algorithms on error-corrected logical qubits is a critical step for scalable quantum computing, but the requisite numbers of qubits and physical error rates are demanding for current experimental hardware. Recently, the development of error correcting codes tailored to particular physical noise models has helped relax these requirements. In this work, we propose a qubit encoding and gate protocol for 171Yb neutral atom qubits that converts the dominant physical errors into erasures, that is, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23 Furthermore, the bare ion remaining after autoionization can be used to convert Rydberg gate errors to erasure errors. 28 This autoionization transition is unique to AEAs and serves as another advantage of this platform for quantum computing architectures.…”
Section: Quantum Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Furthermore, the bare ion remaining after autoionization can be used to convert Rydberg gate errors to erasure errors. 28 This autoionization transition is unique to AEAs and serves as another advantage of this platform for quantum computing architectures.…”
Section: Quantum Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although low-loss readout techniques exist ( 30 , 31 ), finite losses always remain from both the readout itself and the trapping lifetime. Therefore, continuous operation of atom-based quantum processors will require reload and reset operations that overcome these erasure errors ( 32 , 33 ). In this work, we explored two methods for reloading spectators while maintaining coherent data qubits.…”
Section: Coherent Reloading Of Spectator Qubitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These signal the occurrence of potential erasures while leaving the quantum state invariant if no erasures have happened. Such detection protocols have been proposed or even implemented for various architectures [80,84,87]. To be able to protect a logical qubit from single erasures, a code consisting of at least four physical qubits is necessary [79].…”
Section: Correction Of Erasures and Computational Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%