1984
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.1984.1063168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erasable magneto-optical recording media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…E-mail address: tt@stand.ac.uk have been proposed. These schemes can be grouped into four categories: magnetic field modulation [5], optical modulation using single-layer direct overwrite materials [6], erase before write techniques [7] and optical modulation using multiple-layer exchange coupled materials [8].…”
Section: Thin Films For Magneto-optic Recordingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E-mail address: tt@stand.ac.uk have been proposed. These schemes can be grouped into four categories: magnetic field modulation [5], optical modulation using single-layer direct overwrite materials [6], erase before write techniques [7] and optical modulation using multiple-layer exchange coupled materials [8].…”
Section: Thin Films For Magneto-optic Recordingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…alliages à magnétostriction nulle pour les applications en régimes hautes fréquences [25,27], -alliages en films minces pour les dispositifs d'enregistrement et les supports de mémoires [26,[28][29][30][31][32], -alliages en films minces à magnétostriction élevée pour les applications en ondes acoustiques de surfaces, palpeurs, jauges de contrainte, etc. [30, 31, 33, 34], -les applications générales des amorphes magnétiques doux obtenus sous diverses formes par trempe du liquide [2, 23,25,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44],…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Designated as P and Q, each of these sequences forms a Reed-Solomon codeword together with the two corresponding parity bytes. The error detection and correction uses (26,24) and (45,43) RS codes for th~ P and Q sequences, respectively (see also Section 4.7). As the minimum distance dm = 3 for both sequences, it will be possible to either detect exactly the location of 2 erroneous bytes within a codeword or directly correct one byte in error.…”
Section: Block Decodersmentioning
confidence: 99%