Er,Cr:YSGG Laser as a Means of Orthodontic Adhesive Removal: Myth or Reality?

Najafi, Hooman Zarif; Estedlal, Taraneh; Saki, Maryam; Azmi, Amir; Mohamadian, Fatemeh; Moshkelgosha, Vahid

doi:10.1089/photob.2020.4983

Cited by 3 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A comparison between Er,Cr:YSGG laser 2.78 μm and tungsten carbide bur 18 fluted, showed that both methods had the same roughness on the dental enamel surface [7]. There are not enough studies evaluating the effect of the Er,Cr:YSGG lasers [7]. In this research study, the Er,Cr:YSGG laser was evaluated for its effect on the removal of adhesive remnants from the dental enamel surface, in comparison with conventional methods.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…Despite the great success of the tungsten carbide bur, it also showed enamel roughness [4]. As a result, it was suggested that after using the tungsten carbide bur, the enamel surface has to be polished [7].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, these negative drawbacks provoked the researchers to introduce different laser wavelengths with different parameters for adhesive remnant removal, aiming for better results [4]. There is one research study about the Er,Cr:YSGG laser removal of adhesive resin remnants from the dental enamel surface after orthodontic bracket debonding [7].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In this research study, the Er,Cr:YSGG laser was evaluated for its effect on the removal of adhesive remnants from the dental enamel surface, in comparison with conventional methods. The MZ8 tip was used parallel to the tooth structure to decrease the surface roughness, as when the tip angle is lowered, less tooth structure is removed [7,11]. It was proved that when the laser output power is ≤ 1 W, then adhesive resin will not be completely ablated [10].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Evaluating the efficiency of Er,Cr:YSGG laser in removing adhesive remnants from tooth structure after orthodontic brackets debonding

Mady

Sedky²,

Franzen³

2023

Egyptian Orthodontic Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the efficiency of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser compared to tungsten carbide bur in removing adhesive remnants from the enamel surface after orthodontic treatment. Materials and Methods: Stainless steel orthodontic brackets were bonded to freshly extracted 30 human premolars.Teeth were divided into three groups; group I used the tungsten carbide bur 6 fluted with a high-speed

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Evaluating the efficiency of Er,Cr:YSGG laser in removing adhesive remnants from tooth structure after orthodontic brackets debonding

Mady

Sedky²,

Franzen³

2023

Egyptian Orthodontic Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Introducing and assessing the efficacy of a novel method to reduce enamel damage after orthodontic bracket removal using two herbal-based resin colouring agents: An in vitro study

Ahrari

Ramezanian

Ahmadi

et al. 2023

International Orthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evaluation of orthodontists’ attitudes and practices regarding residual resin removal methods

BARRETO,

ALMEIDA,

MACHADO

et al. 2024

Dental Press J. Orthod.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The removal of residual resins is a routine procedure in orthodontic clinics and of great importance to the final result of the treatment. Objective: To evaluate the main methods of residual resin removal used by orthodontists, and the main reasons for choosing these methods. Methods: A questionnaire consisting of 21 questions: 6 relating to demographic data and the other 15 relating to two methods used to remove residual resins (drills or pliers) was sent by e-mail to orthodontists registered with the Regional Councils of Dentistry of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) within April and June, 2023. Questionnaires were sent back by 153 professionals. Results: Residual resin removal is always carried out with high speed drill for 44.7% of the sample, and with low speed drill for 28.7%; 61.3% use irrigation. The multi-laminate carbide bur is used by 82.5% of orthodontists. Pliers are always used by 12.4%. Resin-removing pliers with Widia are used in 39% of cases. The use of high speed was justified by the shorter working time, and the choice of pliers was justified by the smaller damage to the tooth enamel. Conclusion: The most used residual resin removal method was the multi-laminate carbide bur at high speed with irrigation, justified the by shorter working time.

show abstract

Er,Cr:YSGG Laser as a Means of Orthodontic Adhesive Removal: Myth or Reality?

Cited by 3 publications

References 25 publications

Evaluating the efficiency of Er,Cr:YSGG laser in removing adhesive remnants from tooth structure after orthodontic brackets debonding

Evaluating the efficiency of Er,Cr:YSGG laser in removing adhesive remnants from tooth structure after orthodontic brackets debonding

Introducing and assessing the efficacy of a novel method to reduce enamel damage after orthodontic bracket removal using two herbal-based resin colouring agents: An in vitro study

Evaluation of orthodontists’ attitudes and practices regarding residual resin removal methods

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About