2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2011.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equol production changes over time in postmenopausal women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
62
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(70 reference statements)
5
62
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous study with 350 post-menopausal women [81] we observed a relatively high proportion of individuals (up to 35%) who changed EQ status (either from NP to EP (IP+); or EP to NP (IP−)) over the course of 2.5 years. These EP status changes were unexpectedly not associated with antibiotic use (which can disrupt the ecological balance of resident gut bacterial [85] and thereby possibly decrease EQ production) except for selected groups when antibiotic use correlated with IP+.…”
Section: Equol Production Is Variable In Pre- and Post-menopausal Womenmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In a previous study with 350 post-menopausal women [81] we observed a relatively high proportion of individuals (up to 35%) who changed EQ status (either from NP to EP (IP+); or EP to NP (IP−)) over the course of 2.5 years. These EP status changes were unexpectedly not associated with antibiotic use (which can disrupt the ecological balance of resident gut bacterial [85] and thereby possibly decrease EQ production) except for selected groups when antibiotic use correlated with IP+.…”
Section: Equol Production Is Variable In Pre- and Post-menopausal Womenmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…More recently, Franke et al [66,67] reported different intra-individual variations during high- vs. low-soy diet [67], and using different cut-off methods and thresholds [66] for S-(−)equol producers, non-producers and those who crossed-over to either from being a producer to non-producer or vice-versa. Following antibiotic therapy, the majority of the subjects (n = 40 out of 43, or 91%) maintained their relative S-(−)equol producer or non-producer status, while one subject lost the S-(−)equol producing ability following the therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in our study, equol was assessed at only one time point. Although equol production has been shown to be relatively stable within individuals over time in some studies [42, 43], others have suggested that around 6 to 20% of individuals vary or crossover equol phenotypes over relatively short periods of time [44, 45]. However, the evidence to date suggests there is more often a producer to non-producer shift than vice versa [4245].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%