2015
DOI: 10.1112/jtopol/jtv002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equivariant topology of configuration spaces

Abstract: Abstract. We construct a model structure on the category of small categories enriched over a combinatorial closed symmetric monoidal model category satisfying the monoid axiom. Weak equivalences are Dwyer-Kan equivalences, i.e. enriched functors which induce weak equivalences on morphism objects and equivalences of ordinary categories when we take sets of connected components on morphism objects.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of the topological Tverberg problem, index computations played a crucial role (see [15], [17], [6], [8]). For their uses in other geometric contexts see [5], [1], [10], [16], [13]. Our index computations yield the following conclusions for geometric problems which are inspired from Kakutani's Theorem and it's generalizations (see Corollary 5.5 and Theorems 5.6, 5.7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In the context of the topological Tverberg problem, index computations played a crucial role (see [15], [17], [6], [8]). For their uses in other geometric contexts see [5], [1], [10], [16], [13]. Our index computations yield the following conclusions for geometric problems which are inspired from Kakutani's Theorem and it's generalizations (see Corollary 5.5 and Theorems 5.6, 5.7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…where ∆ : X −→ X × X is the diagonal embedding and ∆ * the corresponding homomorphism in homology. From Proposition 2.3 (4)- (5) we have that…”
Section: Some Ingredientsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In the case when t=1 the claim that prefixIndexZ/rfalse(prefixConf(double-struckRd+1,r);Frfalse)=Hd(r1)+1false(double-struckZ/r;Frfalse)is a content of [, Theorem 6.1]. This result can also be deduced from the Vanishing theorem of Cohen [, Theorem 8.2, p. 268].…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem and Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For that we use the Künneth theorem for joins and have that lefttrueHi+t1false(prefixConffalse(Rd+1,rfalse)t;Frfalse)a1++at=itrueHa1false(prefixConf(double-struckRd+1,r);Frfalse)trueHatfalse(prefixConf(double-struckRd+1,r);Frfalse),where the action of Z/r on the tensor product is the diagonal action. The cohomology of the configuration space Hfalse(prefixConf(double-struckRd+1,r);Frfalse), as a double-struckFrfalse[double-struckZ/rfalse]‐module, was described in [, Proof of Theorem 8.5; , Theorem 3.1, Corollary 6.2]. In summary, Hqfalse(prefixConf(double-struckRd+1,r);Frfalse)=leftFr,leftfor4.ptq=0,leftFrfalse[double-struckZ/rfalse]aq,leftfor4.ptq=dj4.ptwhere4.pt1jr...…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem and Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%