2003
DOI: 10.1023/a:1024571719032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equivariant Spectral Triples on the Quantum SU(2) Group

Abstract: We characterize all equivariant odd spectral triples for the quantum SU (2) group acting on its L 2 -space and having a nontrivial Chern character. It is shown that the dimension of an equivariant spectral triple is at least three, and given any element of the K-homology group of SU q (2), there is an equivariant odd spectral triple of dimension 3 inducing that element. The method employed to get equivariant spectral triples in the quantum case is then used for classical SU (2), and we prove that for p < 4, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
175
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
175
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the landscape of Connes noncommutative geometry is much broader. It includes various classical 'pathological' spaces, such as fractals [42], isospectral deformations [43] (in particular the celebrated noncommutative torus [7,44]) or quantum groups [45] and their homogeneous spaces [46].…”
Section: Noncommutative Geometry à La Connesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the landscape of Connes noncommutative geometry is much broader. It includes various classical 'pathological' spaces, such as fractals [42], isospectral deformations [43] (in particular the celebrated noncommutative torus [7,44]) or quantum groups [45] and their homogeneous spaces [46].…”
Section: Noncommutative Geometry à La Connesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact if we want to describe the Galilean spacetime spectrally and explain in addition its connection to non-relativistic quantum fields, it is the central Bargmann extension 39 G of the inhomogeneous Galilean group which is more natural here as a symmetry group. Indeed the appropriate Dirac operator 40 we should use here is the non relativistic Dirac operator −i∂ t ⊗ A − i∂ i ⊗ B i + 1 ⊗ C found by Lévy-Leblond [27], where A, B i , C are elements of a Clifford algebra over the (five dimensional) extension 41 of tangent space with a positive definite and singular quadratic form in it. Indeed, in this 37 Although action of the extension on the Galilean spacetime degenerates to the ordinary action of the inhomogeneous Galilean group, using of the Bargmann extension is essential if one intents to describe spectrally the Galilean spacetime manifold, see below for some further comments.…”
Section: F F (S)θ(x; S)dν λ (S)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 Although for general Dirac-type operator on M with a pseudo-riemannian metric, or even with a more degenerate "metric" structure, there does not exist any natural Hilbert space acted on by D, such that D is (essentially) selfadjoint, there nevertheless does exist natural Krein-type space with respect to which the operator D is selfadjoint in the generalized Krein sense, compare e.g. [26].…”
Section: F F (S)θ(x; S)dν λ (S)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If one replaces condition 3 above with a slightly weaker condition, then one says that the spectral triples (H, π, D) and (H, π , D) are rational Poincaré duals (see [12] for this notion). In an earlier paper ( [3]), the authors constructed an equivariant spectral triple for the quantum SU (2) group that was later analysed further by Connes in [8]. It is natural to ask whether the triple gives rise to a fundamental class for SU q (2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%