2017
DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2016.1641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equivalent to represent inertial and primary frequency control effects of an external system

Abstract: This paper presents a novel equivalent, which is suitable for simulation of inertial and primary frequency control effects. In the model reduction procedure, dynamic power injectors are used to replace the external system and to mimic its dynamic behavior. The parameters of the equivalents are tuned with a simple approach presented in this paper. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated on a modified version of the ENTSO-E Dynamic Study Model. The results show that the system frequency response… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a clear trend that whenever the estimation error for η is above 15%, then where · denotes the vector infinity norm, i.e., the estimated inertia coefficientĤ tot provides a better characterization of the actual system behavior than the nominal one H tot , at least with the model (6), (21 dynamics may have on the behavior of the system frequency. Similar observations on the load voltage dynamics affecting the effective inertia of the system were made in [3], [28]. Given the complexity of the employed ENTSO-E model, we leave a detailed investigation of these aspects as well as a possible extension of the model (6), (21) to incorporate some of them for future work.…”
Section: Bg911190mentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is a clear trend that whenever the estimation error for η is above 15%, then where · denotes the vector infinity norm, i.e., the estimated inertia coefficientĤ tot provides a better characterization of the actual system behavior than the nominal one H tot , at least with the model (6), (21 dynamics may have on the behavior of the system frequency. Similar observations on the load voltage dynamics affecting the effective inertia of the system were made in [3], [28]. Given the complexity of the employed ENTSO-E model, we leave a detailed investigation of these aspects as well as a possible extension of the model (6), (21) to incorporate some of them for future work.…”
Section: Bg911190mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Thus, the overall aggregated power system dynamics are given by (6) and (21) and the corresponding system parameters for the aggregated ENTSO-E system are given in Table I. Remark 4.1: As indicated in [28], the model (21) has proven to be sufficiently accurate for representing PFC effects provided predominantly by steam power plants. If a significant amount of other units, such as hydro or gas power plants, also contribute to PFC, then the model (21) should be modified to account for these dynamics.…”
Section: A Aggregated Power System Model Including Turbine-governor mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this purpose, Dynamic Power Injectors (DPIs) as described in [16] are used to replace the external system and emulate its behavior in long-term dynamic simulations. DPIs are connected to all boundary buses of the buffer zone.…”
Section: B Equivalencing the External Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simple approach to determine one set of parameters suitable for all connected DPIs was presented in [16]. …”
Section: B Equivalencing the External Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation