2013
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equivalent force control method for substructure pseudo‐dynamic test of a full‐scale masonry structure

Abstract: SUMMARY The effectiveness of equivalent force control (EFC) method has been experimentally validated through hybrid tests with simple specimens. In this paper, the EFC method is applied for the MDOF pseudo‐dynamic substructure tests in which a three‐storey frame‐supported reinforced concrete masonry shear wall with full scale is chosen as physical substructure. The effects of equivalent force controller parameters on the response performance are studied. Analytical expressions for the controller parameter rang… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the implicit algorithms generally require iteration, which can result in inconsistent HS test results. To avoid iteration, an equivalent force control (EFC) method [39], which uses feedback control to replace numerical iteration for the real-time HS testing, was proposed. EFC method was used to a full-scale six-story frame-supported reinforced concrete masonry shear wall [39].…”
Section: Equivalent Force Control Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the implicit algorithms generally require iteration, which can result in inconsistent HS test results. To avoid iteration, an equivalent force control (EFC) method [39], which uses feedback control to replace numerical iteration for the real-time HS testing, was proposed. EFC method was used to a full-scale six-story frame-supported reinforced concrete masonry shear wall [39].…”
Section: Equivalent Force Control Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper uses a PD controller as the equivalent force controller. The parameters of the PD controller are obtained as discussed in Reference [39].…”
Section: Equivalent Force Control Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Wu et al pointed out that a PI EF controller can compensate for the steady‐state error and then the feedforward gain K F is not necessary. Lately, to avoid response overshooting and/or oscillation, Chen et al provided analytical expressions for suitable PI parameter ranges. Very recently, Wu et al resorted to employing a robust nonlinear sliding mode control in conjunction with the EFC method.…”
Section: The α‐Methods and The Efc Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EFC method is a versatile substructure testing algorithm due to its possible applications to standard PDT, RST, and even effective force testing . Up to now, in order to verify the method and/or evaluate structural dynamic responses, many analyses and experiments have been carried out, including (a) the RST on a single‐DoF (SDoF) system with a spring specimen; (b) the RST on an offshore platform with a magnetorheological damper specimen; (c) the PDT on both SDoF and MDoF structures endowed with a buckling‐restrained brace specimen; and (d) the substructuring PDT of a full‐scale masonry structure . Besides, the proportional‐derivative control, the proportional‐integral (PI) control, and sliding mode control methods have been employed in the EFC method .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integration algorithm is the key element of the PDT, PDST, and real‐time substructure testing (RST), which is a new testing methodology. There are several new variants that have been investigated and applied in recent years . The operator‐splitting method for RST and the equivalent force control method for PDT and RST were investigated by Wu et al and Chen et al Chang presented the improved explicit Chang method for structural dynamics and Bursi et al investigated novel coupling Rosenbrock‐based algorithms for real‐time dynamic substructure testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%