2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11425-010-0047-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equivalence problem for Bishop surfaces

Abstract: The paper has two parts. We first briefly survey recent studies on the equivalence problem for real submanifolds in a complex space under the action of biholomorphic transformations. We will mainly focus on some of the recent studies of Bishop surfaces, which, in particular, includes the work of the authors. In the second part of the paper, we apply the general theory developed by the authors to explicitly classify an algebraic family of Bishop surfaces with a vanishing Bishop invariant. More precisely, we let… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such surfaces are called Bishop surfaces and the equivalence problem for such surfaces has been studied by a number of authors. We refer the reader to the surveys [H04,HY10] for more detailed account on this topic. We shall now focus on real submanifolds for which CR singularities do not appear.…”
Section: Formal K-equivalence and First Results Let M Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such surfaces are called Bishop surfaces and the equivalence problem for such surfaces has been studied by a number of authors. We refer the reader to the surveys [H04,HY10] for more detailed account on this topic. We shall now focus on real submanifolds for which CR singularities do not appear.…”
Section: Formal K-equivalence and First Results Let M Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Levi-degenerate hypersurfaces in C N , N ≥ 3 satisfying certain special conditions (in addition to the Hormander-Kohn bracket-generating condition) normal form constructions were carried out by Ebenfelt [16,15] and by Kossovskiy-Zaitsev [33]. For results on normal forms for real submanifolds of higher codimension as well as CR-singular submanifolds we refer to Ezhov-Schmalz [18], Beloshapka [4], Lamel-Stolovitch [36], Moser-Webster [39], Huang-Yin [20,21], Gong [19], Coffman [13], Burcea [8]. See also Zaitsev [48] for normal forms in the non-integrable setting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%