2015
DOI: 10.1007/s13398-014-0216-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equivalence of stability properties for ultradifferentiable function classes

Abstract: Abstract. We characterize stability under composition, inversion, and solution of ordinary differential equations for ultradifferentiable classes, and prove that all these stability properties are equivalent.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More precisely, if E [M] is stable under derivation, then stability under composition is in turn equivalent to being holomorphically closed, being inverse closed, (M ♭(c) k ) 1 k being almost increasing, and M ♭(c) having the (FdB)-property. For further equivalent stability properties we refer to [33]. Inverse closedness has been studied intensively, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precisely, if E [M] is stable under derivation, then stability under composition is in turn equivalent to being holomorphically closed, being inverse closed, (M ♭(c) k ) 1 k being almost increasing, and M ♭(c) having the (FdB)-property. For further equivalent stability properties we refer to [33]. Inverse closedness has been studied intensively, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is shown in Lemma 2.2 of Ref. [57] (see also [58,39]) that log-convexity implies (FdB)-stability with an (FdB)-stability constant C FdB = max{1, M 1 }. Since the class C{M} is invariant under multiplication by a constant, we can normalize the sequence M = {M k } k≥0 by an arbitrary positive constant.…”
Section: Remark 1 Using the Leibniz Differentiation Rules Log-superlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words log-convexity implies (FdB)-stability (4). Let us note that usually in the literature [8,60,50,37,66,39,40,41,57,58], ultradifferentiable classes assume log-convexity in order to achieve stability under composition. We refer the reader to [57,58] and references therein for a discussion of the role of log-convexity in achieving stability under composition.…”
Section: Remark 1 Using the Leibniz Differentiation Rules Log-superlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If iii) in a) is satisfied, it follows from the hypotheses on ω and [RaSc2, Theorem 4] that 1 w ∈ E (ω) (X) and that for any m ∈ N the components of the smooth function (ψ m ) −1 : X → X belong to E (ω) (X). Therefore, applying again [RaSc2,Theorem 4] it follows that for every open subset Y of ψ m (X) and any f ∈ E (ω) ((ψ m ) −1 (Y )) the functionf…”
Section: Spaces Of Ultradifferentiable Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%