1995
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.52.5954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equivalence of light-front and covariant field theory

Abstract: In this paper we discuss the relation between the standard covariant quantum field theory and light-front field theory. We define covariant theory by its Feynman diagrams, whereas light-front field theory is defined in terms of light-cone time-ordered diagrams. A general algorithm is proposed that produces the latter from any Feynman diagram. The procedure is illustrated in several cases. Technical problems that occur in the light-front formulation and have no counterpart in the covariant formulation are ident… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
75
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(60 reference statements)
3
75
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The tadpoles, which are necessarily singular because of the arc contributions, are in Ref. [10] found to be…”
Section: Type I Lf Singularitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The tadpoles, which are necessarily singular because of the arc contributions, are in Ref. [10] found to be…”
Section: Type I Lf Singularitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last integral can be evaluated in a straightforward way integrating over k − first and using the residue theorem The two integrals with a single denominator, tadpoles, can be treated using a method pioneered by Ligterink and Bakker [10]. In the latter work a method invented by Yan [11] was utilized.…”
Section: Type I Lf Singularitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If we combine the LF-propagating and instantaneous parts to blinks [19], the longitudinal singularities cancel out. It is easy to show that the open diamond is obtained by integrating a function that is finite in domain 3.…”
Section: Zero Modes In the Box Diagrammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagrams (a) and (b) correspond to region 2, diagrams (c), (d), (e), (f), and (g ) correspond to region 3 and diagrams (h) and (i) correspond to region 4. We can decrease the number of diagrams we have to use with the blink mechanism [19], which we will do for each region.…”
Section: Light-front Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%