1998
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.58.064020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equivalence of black hole thermodynamics between a generalized theory of gravity and the Einstein theory

Abstract: We analyze black hole thermodynamics in a generalized theory of gravity whose Lagrangian is an arbitrary function of the metric, the Ricci tensor and a scalar field. We can convert the theory into the Einstein frame via a "Legendre" transformation or a conformal transformation. We calculate thermodynamical variables both in the original frame and in the Einstein frame, following the Iyer-Wald definition which satisfies the first law of thermodynamics. We show that all thermodynamical variables defined in the o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
75
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are lot of arguments on the fact that which of these two frames can be considered as more physical one [11,12] (also see the reviews [13,14] to get more insights). * krishnakanta@iitg.ernet.in † ashmita.phy@gmail.com ‡ bibhas.majhi@iitg.ernet.in There is another controversial aspect of this theory which states whether the conformal equivalence of the action in the two frames is merely a mathematical equivalence or this equivalence is also reflected in the dynamical [15][16][17][18] and the underlying thermodynamic aspects as well [19][20][21][22][23] (also see the recent papers [24][25][26][27][28], which discusses on the equivalence of the two frames in the quantum level). There are a few unsolved issues such as, what are the explicit covariant expressions of the physical quantities (energy, entropy, temperature) and how they are connected in the two frames.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are lot of arguments on the fact that which of these two frames can be considered as more physical one [11,12] (also see the reviews [13,14] to get more insights). * krishnakanta@iitg.ernet.in † ashmita.phy@gmail.com ‡ bibhas.majhi@iitg.ernet.in There is another controversial aspect of this theory which states whether the conformal equivalence of the action in the two frames is merely a mathematical equivalence or this equivalence is also reflected in the dynamical [15][16][17][18] and the underlying thermodynamic aspects as well [19][20][21][22][23] (also see the recent papers [24][25][26][27][28], which discusses on the equivalence of the two frames in the quantum level). There are a few unsolved issues such as, what are the explicit covariant expressions of the physical quantities (energy, entropy, temperature) and how they are connected in the two frames.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4.1). In addition, it has been proven [14] that the Noether charge Q H [ξ (h) ] conjugate to the Killing vector ξ a (h) , which gives the entropy of a black hole, also remains unchanged under the Legendre transformation. Then, we can employ the same method as shown in Sec.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of an asymptotically flat black hole, it has been proven [13,14] that the entropy of a black hole in the original frame and that in the Einstein frame coincide with each other. …”
Section: The First Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(35) and (36), but in the second variation of the horizon-entropy for causal horizons, through eqs. (28) and (31). If the right hand side of (38) ever becomes positive then the horizon-entropy of the quasi-local horizons will immediately start to decrease, but the change of horizon-entropy of a causal horizon may still increase because in this case it only influences the second variation of the horizon-entropy.…”
Section: Brans-dicke Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%