2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2011.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equivalence in the strength of deer herbivory on above and below ground communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, earthworm depletion of top soil layers (O horizon) may lead to nutrient pulses that benefit B. thunbergii growth. Furthermore, deer and earthworm impacts on soil microbial communities may indirectly alter above-and below-ground trophic interactions (Bardgett et al, 1998;Eisenhauer et al, 2011;Lessard et al, 2012;Dempsey et al, 2013;Kardol et al, 2014). In addition, both deer and earthworms have detrimental effects on native understory plant communities (Côté et al, 2004;Hale et al, 2006), likely reducing competition with palatable plant species and favoring growth of non-palatable B. thunbergii.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Similarly, earthworm depletion of top soil layers (O horizon) may lead to nutrient pulses that benefit B. thunbergii growth. Furthermore, deer and earthworm impacts on soil microbial communities may indirectly alter above-and below-ground trophic interactions (Bardgett et al, 1998;Eisenhauer et al, 2011;Lessard et al, 2012;Dempsey et al, 2013;Kardol et al, 2014). In addition, both deer and earthworms have detrimental effects on native understory plant communities (Côté et al, 2004;Hale et al, 2006), likely reducing competition with palatable plant species and favoring growth of non-palatable B. thunbergii.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although the influence of ungulates is most pronounced on aboveground biota (e.g., plants, invertebrates, birds), their direct/indirect effects on belowground biota (e.g., microbes and invertebrates) has also been reported (Côté et al, 2004;Hédl et al, 2010;Rooney and Waller, 2003;Wardle, 2002Wardle, , 2006). An overabundance of ungulates has negative effects on the decomposer community (Wallace, 1987;Sørensen et al, 2009;Gass and Binkley, 2011;Niwa et al, 2011), worsens topsoil physics Gass and Binkley, 2011), reduces litter accumulation (Wakahara et al, 2008;Lessard et al, 2012;Heckel et al, 2010), and potentially changes litter decomposition rates (Wardle, 2002). In addition, succession of aboveground vegetation usually homogenizes the forest http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.06.028 0378-1127/Ó 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These indirect effects are wide-ranging, including songbirds (Allombert et al 2005), wildcat populations (Lozano et al 2007), insect populations (Brousseau et al 2013), and even belowground communities (Lessard et al 2012). It is inherently diffi cult to include other organisms in grid-based inventories and therefore ecosystem perspectives have not been suffi ciently recognized in the past.…”
Section: Ecosystem Consequences Of Tree Diversity Losses To Other Orgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among disturbances, browsing by ungulates has direct effects on the establishment and maintenance of plant species and indirect effects on other organisms (Lessard et al 2012). The consequences of this disturbance regime are closely related to forest ecosystem resilience and thus of particular importance for forest management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation