1993
DOI: 10.4310/jdg/1214453682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equivalence classes of polarizations and moduli spaces of sheaves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For nongeometric compactifications, even less is knownno one knows any analogue of the stability constraint. 4 Kahler cone substructure Note that Mumford-Takemoto stability depends implicitly upon the choice of Kahler form [2, 3,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. This choice is extremely important -sheaves that are stable with respect to one Kahler form may not be stable with respect to another.…”
Section: M^) (mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For nongeometric compactifications, even less is knownno one knows any analogue of the stability constraint. 4 Kahler cone substructure Note that Mumford-Takemoto stability depends implicitly upon the choice of Kahler form [2, 3,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. This choice is extremely important -sheaves that are stable with respect to one Kahler form may not be stable with respect to another.…”
Section: M^) (mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been studied by a number of authors (e.g. [49], [23], [18]). Assume for simplicity that S is simply connected.…”
Section: Moduli Of Vector Bundlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have walls and chambers in C S in the same vein as before (actually they are the intersections of the walls and chambers of H with C S , whenever this intersection is non-empty). Now M H (c 1 , c 2 ) is constant on the chambers of C S (and so the invariant stays the same), and when H crosses a wall W ζ , M H (c 1 , c 2 ) changes (see [13]). From the point of view of the Donaldson invariants, this corresponds to restricting our attention from the positive cone of S to its ample cone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%