2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.fss.2005.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equivalence and transformation of extended algebraic operators in fuzzy relational databases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, new FRDB models still continue to be developed for modeling data objects of the real world. Some FRDB models, such as [8], [9], [10] and [11], represented a fuzzy relation as a set of tuples whose each attribute may take a fuzzy set or a possibility distribution inferred from a fuzzy set. Fuzzy relational algebraic operations on these models were defined by employing similarity relations on the domain of the attributes and proximity binary relations on fuzzy sets or employing the possibility theory and proximity binary relations on possibility distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, new FRDB models still continue to be developed for modeling data objects of the real world. Some FRDB models, such as [8], [9], [10] and [11], represented a fuzzy relation as a set of tuples whose each attribute may take a fuzzy set or a possibility distribution inferred from a fuzzy set. Fuzzy relational algebraic operations on these models were defined by employing similarity relations on the domain of the attributes and proximity binary relations on fuzzy sets or employing the possibility theory and proximity binary relations on possibility distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, there have been many fuzzy relational database models studied and built (e.g. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]) based on the fuzzy set theory [2,3] to overcome the limitations of the classical relational database model in representing and handling uncertain and imprecise information of objects in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two main approaches to represent fuzzy relations in fuzzy relational database models: (1) representing each fuzzy relation as a set of tuples whose each attribute may take a fuzzy set or a possibility distribution is inferred from a fuzzy set (e.g. [4][5] or [6][7][8][9][10][11], respectively), whereby the membership degree of tuples for the relation is hidden in that of their attribute values; (2) representing each fuzzy relation as a fuzzy set of tuples whose each attribute only takes a single and precise value (e.g. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]), whereby the membership degree of tuples for the relation also is the membership degree of elements for the fuzzy set expressing that fuzzy relation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Međutim, ako za  uzmemo vrednost 0.9 koja nije čvorna tačka, imaćemo rezultat koji se ne razlikuje pri gornjoj i donjoj toleranciji od 10%.Fazi relacioni model baza podataka predložen od strane Buckles-a i Petry-a, zasnovan na teoriji sličnosti, predstavlja generalizaciju klasične relacione baze podataka. Shenoi i Melton[25,27,62] zamenjuju relaciju sličnosti sa relacijom bliskosti i na taj način proširuju fazi relacioni model baza podataka. Uvođenjem relacije bliskosti značajno se pojednostavljuje generisanje fazi upita nad fazi relacionim bazama podataka, što je i prikazano u ovom poglavlju.…”
unclassified