This study empirically examines the determinants of heterogeneous firm-level cooperative R&D commercialization strategies. While the volume of interfirm collaboration has increased dramatically in recent decades, the determinants of firm-level choices among alternate modes of such cooperative activity remain relatively understudied. We develop a conceptual model of factors determining collaborative mode choice at the organizational portfolio level. These factors include the firm-level appropriation environment, in which deal-level choices have portfolio-level spillover implications, as well as governance capabilities developed by the firm over time. Using a random sample of innovating biotechnology start-ups, we assemble a firm-year panel dataset that aggregates transaction-level collaboration data to the firm-year level, allowing us to characterize firms' portfolios of collaborative deals. We find broad empirical support for our model, suggesting that a firm's appropriation environment and governance capabilities strongly influence portfolio-level collaboration mode choices. In addition, we explore the implications of governance capability development, finding that experience with particular modes, as well as deviations from existing capabilities, impact firm valuation.
ABSTRACTThis paper empirically examines the determinants of heterogeneous cooperative R&D commercialization strategies of innovating biotechnology start-ups. While the volume of inter-firm collaboration, spanning modes such as strategic alliances and technology licensing, has increased dramatically in recent decades, prior research has seldom analyzed the firm-level organizational choice between alternate modes of such cooperative activity. The organization of collaborative commercialization has important resource allocation, corporate development, and strategic implications for innovating firms, particularly in the biotechnology industry, as self-commercialization in this industry is rare. Using a random sample of over 100 biotechnology innovators, we assemble a firm-year panel dataset to examine the relative importance of organizational governance capability and transaction cost measures in explaining the variation in cooperative mode choice. We do this by aggregating transaction-level collaboration data to the firm-year level (thereby characterizing firms' portfolio of collaborative deals). In firm level analyses of collaborative choice intensities and transaction level analyses of alternate modes of organizing a deal, we find empirical support for organizational governance capability theories and mixed support for transaction cost theories. Moreover, we find that firm valuation is shaped both by experience in particular collaborative modes and by deviations from historic collaboration mode capabilities.