Equity issues were not fully addressed in Cochrane human immunodeficiency virus systematic reviews

Aves, Theresa; Kredo, Tamara; Welch, Vivian; Mursleen, Sara; Ross, Stephanie; Zani, Babalwa; Motaze, Nkengafac Villyen; Quinlan, Leah; Mbuagbaw, Lawrence

doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.09.008

Cited by 12 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, the origins of many risk behaviors and exposures are shaped by adverse social determinants of health and root causes of inequities (e.g., structural racism, unjust allocation of power and resources). Even though we have a deep literature on the importance of social determinants [8,10,29,30], most repositories of EBIs are organized around downstream diseases and risk factors, with inadequate attention to upstream factors and solutions [31].…”

Section: Limitations Of the Evidence Basementioning

confidence: 99%

Implementation science should give higher priority to health equity

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background There is growing urgency to tackle issues of equity and justice in the USA and worldwide. Health equity, a framing that moves away from a deficit mindset of what society is doing poorly (disparities) to one that is positive about what society can achieve, is becoming more prominent in health research that uses implementation science approaches. Equity begins with justice—health differences often reflect societal injustices. Applying the perspectives and tools of implementation science has potential for immediate impact to improve health equity. Main text We propose a vision and set of action steps for making health equity a more prominent and central aim of implementation science, thus committing to conduct implementation science through equity-focused principles to achieve this vision in U.S. research and practice. We identify and discuss challenges in current health disparities approaches that do not fully consider social determinants. Implementation research challenges are outlined in three areas: limitations of the evidence base, underdeveloped measures and methods, and inadequate attention to context. To address these challenges, we offer recommendations that seek to (1) link social determinants with health outcomes, (2) build equity into all policies, (3) use equity-relevant metrics, (4) study what is already happening, (5) integrate equity into implementation models, (6) design and tailor implementation strategies, (7) connect to systems and sectors outside of health, (8) engage organizations in internal and external equity efforts, (9) build capacity for equity in implementation science, and (10) focus on equity in dissemination efforts. Conclusions Every project in implementation science should include an equity focus. For some studies, equity is the main goal of the project and a central feature of all aspects of the project. In other studies, equity is part of a project but not the singular focus. In these studies, we should, at a minimum, ensure that we “leave no one behind” and that existing disparities are not widened. With a stronger commitment to health equity from funders, researchers, practitioners, advocates, evaluators, and policy makers, we can harvest the rewards of the resources being invested in health-related research to eliminate disparities, resulting in health equity.

show abstract

Section: Limitations Of the Evidence Basementioning

confidence: 99%

Implementation science should give higher priority to health equity

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The same results were found in Cochrane systematic reviews related to HIV infection. 28 In another study, it was found that in the studies that conducted strategies to improve the quality of life of diabetic patients, less than one-third of the trials were concerned with the inclusion of health equity criteria. 29 The PROGRESS framework was first proposed by Evans et al in 2003.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Health Equity Consideration in Cochrane Systematic Reviews and Primary Studies on Add-on Therapy for Refractory Focal Epilepsy Treatment

Soleimani,

Mirzaasgari,

Mahdizadeh

et al. 2024

ArchEpilepsy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…A number of bibliometric analyses of research are on immunodeficiency, many of which focus on human immunodeficiency virus. [26][27][28][29][30] Some bibliometric analyses have also been published on HSCT. [31,32] In this study, we provide an overview of studies on HSCT for the treatment of PID.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The research on the treatment of primary immunodeficiency diseases by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A bibliometric analysis from 2013 to 2022

Xu²,

et al. 2023

Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is curative in patients with primary immunodeficiency syndrome. The safety and efficacy of HSCT as a therapeutic option for primary immunodeficiency diseases (PID) have been studied by many research groups. The purpose of our study was to perform a bibliometric analysis of research on HSCT for the treatment of PID, to assess research trends in this field, and note future research priorities. The Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) was used to identify relevant publications. VOSviewer and CiteSpace software were used to analyze bibliometric parameters, such as yearly records, authors, grouped authors, countries, institutions, categories and keywords. There are 602 relevant records for the last decade (2013–2022). The top 5 productive authors and high-quality paper journals are listed. Reference co-citations analysis demonstrated recent research trends were “inborn errors of immunity,” “gene editing,” and “enteropathy.” Research on HSCT for the treatment of PID has increased rapidly in the last decade, and bibliometrics are valuable for researchers to obtain an overview of hot categories, academic collaborations and trends in this study field.

show abstract

Equity issues were not fully addressed in Cochrane human immunodeficiency virus systematic reviews

Cited by 12 publications

References 15 publications

Implementation science should give higher priority to health equity

Implementation science should give higher priority to health equity

Health Equity Consideration in Cochrane Systematic Reviews and Primary Studies on Add-on Therapy for Refractory Focal Epilepsy Treatment

The research on the treatment of primary immunodeficiency diseases by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A bibliometric analysis from 2013 to 2022

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About