Equity in health insurance schemes enrollment in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background Ensuring access to essential quality health services and reducing financial hardship for all individuals regardless of their ability to pay are the main goals of universal health coverage. Various health insurance schemes have been recently implemented in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to achieve both of these objectives. We systematically reviewed all available literature to assess the extent to which current health insurance schemes truly reach the poor and underserved populations in LMICs. Methods In the systematic review, we searched on PubMed, Web of Science, EconLit and Google Scholar to identify eligible studies which captured health insurance enrollment information in LMICs from 2010 up to September 2019. Two authors independently selected studies, extracted data, and appraised included studies. The primary outcome of interest was health insurance enrollment of the most vulnerable populations relative to enrollment of the best-off subgroups. We classified households both with respect to their highest educational attainment and their relative wealth and used random-effects meta-analysis to estimate average enrollment gaps. Results 48 studies from 17 countries met the inclusion criteria. The average enrollment rate into health insurance schemes for vulnerable populations was 36% with an inter-quartile range of 26%. On average, across countries, households from the wealthiest subgroup had 61% higher odds (95% CI: 1.49 to 1.73) of insurance enrollment than households in the poorest group in the same country. Similarly, the most educated groups had 64% (95% CI: 1.32 to 1.95) higher odds of enrollment than the least educated groups. Conclusion The results of this study show that despite major efforts by governments, health insurance schemes in low-and middle-income countries are generally not reaching the targeted underserved populations and predominantly supporting better-off population groups. Current health insurance designs should be carefully scrutinized, and the extent to which health insurance can be used to support the most vulnerable populations carefully re-assessed by countries, which are aiming to use health insurance schemes as means to reach their UHC goals. Furthermore, studies exploring best practices to include vulnerable groups in health insurance schemes are needed. Registration Not available

Uptake of health insurance in Malawi in 2019-2020: Evidence from the Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey

“…For example; the level of health insurance coverage in SSA is low; only 8 of the 36 countries examined had a mean level of insurance coverage with any type of health insurance of above 10%, while only 4 had a coverage level of above 20% [2]. The coverage in the other settings have been higher than what was reported in Malawi [14]. The differences may be attributed to the differences in the socio-demographic characteristics of the individuals as well as different funding mechanisms for the National Health Insurance systems.…”

Factors determining membership in community-based health insurance in West Africa: a scoping review

“…Among the various challenges facing CBHI schemes, enrolment currently appears to be the predominant issue [5][6][7]. Although the mutualist movement is growing steadily in West Africa, the coverage of the target population rarely exceeds 30% [7][8][9][10].…”

“…Among the various challenges facing CBHI schemes, enrolment currently appears to be the predominant issue [5][6][7]. Although the mutualist movement is growing steadily in West Africa, the coverage of the target population rarely exceeds 30% [7][8][9][10]. One thing is clear everywhere: the membership rates of CBHI schemes remain relatively low, sometimes even calling into question the very viability of the organisation [5,11].…”

Glucopuncture: A novel injection technique for medically underserved populations

“…Some of these medics practice in remote areas where modern technology is not available, others work in cities where specialized diagnostic tools and hi-tech treatments are too expensive for low-income patients. On top of that, LMICs also have low levels of health insurance coverage [2,3]. As a result, it is obvious that medical guidelines developed for high-income settings need to be adapted to create a realistic medical care program for MUPs in LMICs.…”