Equity and the Constitution

McDowell, Gary L.

doi:10.2307/1340804

Cited by 9 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition it is convenient to establish a new interaction which we call the exchange interaction [7] and define by the equation where (rnillfli) = (milfli)-(milin).…”

Section: Perturbation Expansionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Robb [ 5 ] has developed such a formalism and applied it to several systems using localized molecular orbitals [S]. In this paper we consider the application of this formalism to the ground state energy of the methyl radical with the intent of testing the formalism and of pointing out some features of computations on open-shell systems [6] which we have developed but not previously published in a widely distributed form [7,8]. In the next section we introduce the basic formalism in a somewhat different fashion than that presented by Robb [ S ] .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Use of noncanonical orbitals in many‐body perturbation theory

McDowell

1981

Int J of Quantum Chemistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AbstractsA formalism for dealing with noncanonical Hartree-Fock spin orbitals is presented within the framework of many-body perturbation theory. A test calculation on the planar methyl radical is carried out which displays certain features of open-shell calculations and which demonstrates the viability of using noncanonical spin orbitals. Results are found to be in good agreement with a previous configuration interaction calculation.

show abstract

“…In addition it is convenient to establish a new interaction which we call the exchange interaction [7] and define by the equation where (rnillfli) = (milfli)-(milin).…”

Section: Perturbation Expansionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Use of noncanonical orbitals in many‐body perturbation theory

McDowell

1981

Int J of Quantum Chemistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…19 19 See in particular McDowell, “Are moral requirements hypothetical imperatives?,” “Virtue and reason,” and “The role of eudaimonia in Aristotle's ethics,” in McDowell (1998, pp. 77–94, 50–76 and 3–22). …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Schelling on freedom, evil and imputation: A puzzle

Stern

2023

European J of Philosophy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper is focused on F. W. J. Schelling's view of freedom during the period of the Freiheitsschrift (1809) and related works. It is argued that the standard way this has been understood may be too simplistic. On this standard interpretation of his view, evil is made a matter of free choice by the agent, but where the choice does not concern individual actions, but the choice of the agent's essence in an atemporal act. As a result of this choice, it is argued, Schelling can then make evil imputable. By contrast, I argue that for Schelling freedom does not involve choice, but necessity, but in a way that is still internal to the agent and hence non‐coercive, and thus in a way that remains free and makes evil imputable. How Schelling comes to have this view is considered, and some responses are given to ways it might be challenged both interpretatively and philosophically.

show abstract

Equity

Bray¹

2019

Equity and Law

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Equity and the Constitution

Cited by 9 publications

References 0 publications

Use of noncanonical orbitals in many‐body perturbation theory

Use of noncanonical orbitals in many‐body perturbation theory

Schelling on freedom, evil and imputation: A puzzle

Equity

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About