Equitable multilingualism? The case of Stellenbosch University Writing Laboratory

Abstract

This article reflects on Stellenbosch University Writing Lab's pedagogical approach to multilingualism and inclusivity within the complex and political nature of multilingual language policies at a South African university. The Writing Lab has always been promoted as a facility for all students, not just those in need of 'remedial' support. This was a departure from earlier academic literacies models that tended to view students from nondominant language groups in terms of deficits. Academic literacies research has pointed to the shortcomings of these earlier approaches and to the value conflicts that arise from them. We, in contrast, argue that Carter's (2009) writing centre paradox provides a dynamic rhetorical space in which to explore issues around South African multilingualism and inclusivity in higher education, and for this reason we do not wish to resolve the paradox. Instead, we use it to critically appraise our type of equitable multilingualism and maintain and honour multivocality. We also argue that South African writing centres enjoy a somewhat different trajectory from that of many other academic literacies spaces by virtue of the one-to-one pedagogy and mutualistic approach we follow at these writing centres. This has allowed us simultaneously more agency and less agency and we need to use this paradoxical position strategically in our institutions. Using the Writing Lab as a case study, we reflect on the ways in which the Writing Lab gives life to its ethos of being a multilingual and inclusive space for academic transformation within the institution's language policy. To support our reflections, we draw on descriptions of the organisational structure of the Lab, feedback received from strategic role players and observations of interactions performed in the various Lab spaces. We also consider the Writing Lab in terms of South African writing centre scholarship to see how the Lab's philosophy and ethos compare with the ideals.

Challenges and Opportunities for Open, Distance, and Digital Education in the Global South

“…In addition, reading on paper is not the same as reading on screen, and so new techniques may be required. It may be necessary to adopt strategies such as development of multilingual glossaries, multilingual captions for video materials, or even full translation of some resources into other languages, as well as the development of a related set of more general digital literacy skills (Daniels & Richards, 2017;de la Fuente & Comas-Quinn, 2016).…”

Reimagining Writing Centres Practices: A South African Perspective

“…Many students who share some or all of these and other, characteristics that make university exceptionally tough going come every year to university writing centres for help with their written for the purpose of continuing development and learning Clarence 2016;Daniels and Richards 2011). Regular training and development meetings provide excellent opportunities to turn the selection of topics for discussion over to the tutors, to engage them more directly in their own learning (Clarence 2016) and to discuss problems that arise as the semester progresses, questions tutors have and feedback from students and lecturers.…”

“…analysis ; error analysis ; evaluation and self-evaluation ; genre teaching (Archer 2010;Boughey 2012); constructive feedback (Boughey 2012); collaborative discussion Daniels and Richards 2011;Dowse and Van Rensburg 2011); using a Socratic approach ; educating students on academic voice and plagiarism ; and improving students' sense of coherence and cohesion .…”

“…The goal of consultant training is to prepare consultants to meet the needs of a diverse student population, through developing their understanding of the importance, challenges and pedagogies of academic literacies . Although the nature and focus of training varies from one centre to another, consultants usually receive intensive training following their recruitment, with further training throughout their tenure Daniels and Richards 2011;Boughey 2012;Muna et al 2019).…”

Between a rock and a hard place: Ethics, nurses' safety, and the right to protest during the COVID‐19 pandemic

“…Nursing has always been an indispensable pillar of healthcare systems; their action or inaction greatly determines patient health outcomes. Nurses are expected to deliver quality healthcare services to patients in healthy and safe environments as clearly articulated in the Patients' Rights Charter (Daniels, 2020 ; Singh & Mathuray, 2018 ).…”