2014
DOI: 10.1117/12.2057179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equipment vibration budget for the TMT

Abstract: Vibration from equipment mounted on the telescope and in summit support buildings has been a source of performance degradation at existing observatories, for adaptive optics performance in particular. To ensure that that t he total optical performance degradation due to vibration is less than t he corresponding optical error budget allocation, a vibration budget has been creat ed that specifies allowable force levels from each source of vibration in the observatory (e.g., pumps, chillers, cryocoolers, etc.) . … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MAViC isolates at a natural frequency below 0.7Hz, combining this with a rigidly mounted six axis accelerometer capable of DC measurements, allows very accurate measurements to be made. Measurements were compared against the instrument requirement for the VLT 2 , GMT, and TMT 3 . Based on those, the amount of required isolation can be derived and used as a guideline for designing cryocooler mounts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MAViC isolates at a natural frequency below 0.7Hz, combining this with a rigidly mounted six axis accelerometer capable of DC measurements, allows very accurate measurements to be made. Measurements were compared against the instrument requirement for the VLT 2 , GMT, and TMT 3 . Based on those, the amount of required isolation can be derived and used as a guideline for designing cryocooler mounts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 These disturbances apply equal and opposite torques to the telescope structure and the relevant optic. While the former can result in excitation of telescope resonances and motion of other optical surfaces, the resulting image jitter and M1 response are negligible compared with the direct response of the driven surface, which can be roughly estimated from the mirror inertial response.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%