Equine rhinitis A virus (ERAV) shares many features with foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) and both are classified within the genus Aphthovirus of the family Picornaviridae. ERAV is used as a surrogate for FMDV research as it does not require high-level biosecurity. In contrast to FMDV, which uses integrins as cellular receptors, the receptor for ERAV has been reported to involve the sugar moiety sialic acid. This study confirmed the importance of sialic acid for cell entry by ERAV and reports the crystal structure of ERAV particles complexed with the receptor analogue 39-sialyllactose. The receptor is attached to the rim of a capsid pit adjacent to the major immunogenic site and distinct from the sialic acid binding site used by a related picornavirus, the cardiovirus Theiler's murine encephalitis virus. The structure of the major antigenic determinant of the virus, previously identified from antibody escape mutations, is also described as the EF loop of VP1, which forms a hairpin stretching across the capsid surface close to the icosahedral fivefold axis, neighbouring the receptor-binding site, and spanning two protomeric units.
INTRODUCTIONEquine rhinitis A virus (ERAV) is one of several picornaviruses that cause cold-like symptoms in horses. ERAV is genetically most closely related to foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) and both viruses are classified within the genus Aphthovirus. The virus contains a positive-sense RNA genome of approximately 7700 nt with a genome organization broadly typical of picornaviruses. The genome is contained within a non-enveloped icosahedral capsid comprising 60 copies of each of the viral proteins: VP1, VP2, VP3 and VP4. In all picornaviruses, VP1-3 adopt the typical viral eight-stranded b-barrel fold with the loops connecting the strands (labelled B-I). The surface-exposed loops together with the C termini define the antigenic phenotype of the virus. We have recently determined the crystallographic structure of ERAV, which showed a broad similarity to FMDV, with the most significant differences relating to the increased length and conformation of the surface loops in VP1 (Tuthill et al., 2009). Both ERAV and FMDV dissociate into pentameric capsid subunits at low pH and this was thought to be the mechanism for genome release from the particle. However, we also recently demonstrated the existence of a low-pH-derived empty particle of ERAV that had lost its RNA, indicating that genome release and capsid dissociation may be distinct events, and the structure of a low-pH particle also provided clues to the mechanism of capsid dissociation (Tuthill et al., 2009).ERAV and FMDV share a number of distinctive physical properties such as buoyant density, base composition and acid lability, as well as biological properties such as a broad host-cell range and the propensity for persistent infection. However, the disease caused by ERAV is quite different to that caused by FMDV and hence it is not surprising that the receptors utilized by these viruses differ.FMDV field viruses are dependen...