2022 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/wacv51458.2022.00023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equine Pain Behavior Classification via Self-Supervised Disentangled Pose Representation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a more recent work of ours [49], we perform equine pain recognition on 3D pose representations extracted from multi-view surveillance data, on the same low grade orthopedic pain trial as in this paper. Although the horses and pain trial are the same as in the current work, the crucial difference is that the data used in [49] is different (surveillance data in the box, whereas here, we use videos recorded with a tripod outside the box, where the facial expression is visible), and that only the pose representation is used for classification. This is advantageous to reduce the amount of extraneous information.…”
Section: Automatic Pain Recognition In Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a more recent work of ours [49], we perform equine pain recognition on 3D pose representations extracted from multi-view surveillance data, on the same low grade orthopedic pain trial as in this paper. Although the horses and pain trial are the same as in the current work, the crucial difference is that the data used in [49] is different (surveillance data in the box, whereas here, we use videos recorded with a tripod outside the box, where the facial expression is visible), and that only the pose representation is used for classification. This is advantageous to reduce the amount of extraneous information.…”
Section: Automatic Pain Recognition In Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the potential disadvantage is that any facial expressions are not possible to take into account. As a result, it is perhaps the adjustment of pose as a result of previous pain that is recognized in [49], rather than whether a pain experience is ongoing. Similarly to the present work, it is found that low grade orthopedic pain is difficult to detect, compared to the less noisy pain trial used in [22].…”
Section: Automatic Pain Recognition In Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, the meta-analysis of the works in Table 1 is organized according to the different stages of a typical workflow in studies within this domain: data collection and annotation, followed by data analysis (typically, model training and inference) and last, performance evaluation. For each of these stages, we classify the methods and techniques applied in these [76] unknown or naturally occurring face + Lencioni et al [77] Horses pain surgical castration face + Hummel et al [38] unknown or induced pain face + Broomé et al [78] induced pain body and face + Broomé et al [79] induced pain body and face + Rashid et al [80] induced pain body + Reulke et al [81] vet. procedure body -Corujo et al [82] emotion unknown body and face + Li et al [83] --face ---Feightelstein et al [84] Cats pain vet.…”
Section: Meta-analysis Of Computer Vision-based Approaches For Classi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infrared cameras placed on top of the face are also used, but these observe movement patterns, and not facial expressions. Equines are recorded in a box [80,94] from multi-view surveillance cameras, or in open areas, but with static cameras placed at a distance to capture the animal from the side [38,78,79,95], or frontally, when the animal is next to a feeder [77]. The side view makes observing the bodily behavior easier, but only one side of the face is visible.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The availability of such visual-temp data enables addressing it in two manners: (i) single frames and (ii) sequences of frames. The first implies more information loss, but is simpler and more controllable; while the latter includes temporal dimension, which has been shown to have importance for such tasks, e.g., in the context of detection of pain in horses [9,40]. The prevalent approach in the context of automated recognition of effective states and pain in animals, is, however, the single frame basis (e.g., [2,29,33,36]).…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%