Equilibrium unemployment-inequality correlation

Cysne, Rubens Penha; Turchick, David

doi:10.1016/j.jmacro.2011.12.009

Cited by 15 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…That is, an increase in consumption, especially non-food consumption, increases income inequality, because most of the non-food consumption expenditure comes from low income goes to people with high income. And also as found by Cysne and Turchick (2012) that an increase in unemployment increases income inequality. And the results run with the results of Sulemana, Nketiah-Amponsah et al (2019)and Qiu and Zhao (2019) who found that urbanization exacerbated income inequality.…”

Section: Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan Issn 1411-6081 E-issn 2460-9331 152mentioning

confidence: 67%

“…As well as, Brito and Kerstenetzky (2019) found that the minimum wage contributed to a decrease of 38.2% in the proportion of poor people, and 39.4% in the intensity of poverty and 40.6% reduction in the severity of poverty. Then an increase in unemployment will increase income inequality, as found by Cysne and Turchick (2012) i that income inequality is positively correlated with unemployment if the unemployment rate and the Gini coefficient are greater than 15% and 28% respectively.…”

Section: D) Joint Determination Of Income Inequalitymentioning

confidence: 92%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Joint Determinants of Monetary, Macroeconomic, Social and Income Inequality

Taresh

Sari

Purwono

2020

JEP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study discusses all the potential relationships between monetary, macroeconomic, social and income inequality in an integrated manner by making Indonesia a concrete case study. This empirical study discussed the relationship based on theoretical modelling and carried out through appropriate estimators applied to the data of 33 provinces in Indonesia. To achieve this objective, the simultaneous model of seemingly unrelated regressions (SUR) was used. The results concluded that there are variables that jointly determined the monetary, macroeconomic and social also income inequality. Like, consumption can increase inflation and macroeconomic while at the same time can reduce population growth and human development, and increases income inequality. Savings which determine credit also pushes macroeconomics while simultaneously increasing population growth, and it can reduce income inequality. Minimum wages can reduce inflation and encourage production growth, while increases human development and reduces population growth also can reduce income inequality. Unemployment can also reduce inflation and increase economic growth, at the same time reduces population growth and human development while increases income inequality. Education and health encourages economic growth and the level of human development then can reduce income inequality.

show abstract

Section: Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan Issn 1411-6081 E-issn 2460-9331 152mentioning

confidence: 67%

Section: D) Joint Determination Of Income Inequalitymentioning

confidence: 92%

Joint Determinants of Monetary, Macroeconomic, Social and Income Inequality

Taresh

Sari

Purwono

2020

JEP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Selain pendidikan, tingkat pengangguran dan kemiskinan juga mempunyai peran penting untuk mengurangi ketimpangan pendapatan yang terjadi. Peningkatan pengangguran memiliki dampak yang memberatkan pada ketimpangan pendapatan (Cysne & Turchick, 2012).…”

Section: Gambar 1 Perkembagan Gini Rasio DI Indonesia Maret 2011-sepunclassified

“…Penelitian ini sesuai dengan penelitian Nielson & Alderson (2015) yang menyatakan bahwa pada tahun 1970 dan 1990, pengangguran tidak mempunyai pengaruh terhadap ketimpangan pendapatan. Tetapi, tidak sesuai dengan beberapa penelitian terdahulu, diantaranya penelitian oleh Cysne & Turchick (2012), Deyshappriya (2017), Pi & Zhang (2018), Syilviarani (2017), dan Ukpere & Slabbert (2009) yang menemukan bahwa pengangguran meningkatkan ketimpangan pendapatan.…”

Section: Tabel 4 Hasil Uji Lagrange Multiplierunclassified

Pengaruh Pendidikan, Pengangguran, dan Kemiskinan terhadap Ketimpangan Pendapatan di Indonesia

Hindun

Soejoto

Hariyati

2019

JEBIK

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research aims to analyze the effect of education, unemployment, and poverty on income inequality in Indonesia, both partially and simultaneously. This research uses secondary data with a quantitative approach. The type of research used is the type of associative research. The variables in this study are education, unemployment, poverty, and income inequality — data source from BPS and the Ministry of Education and Culture. The data analysis technique used is panel data regression analysis with cross-section 34 provinces and time series for 2015-2018. The results of the research obtained the random effect model, the best models. The results of data analysis show that education and poverty had a partial effect on income inequality in Indonesia, while unemployment had not to affect income inequality. Simultaneously, education, unemployment, and poverty affect income inequality in Indonesia. However, education, unemployment, and poverty can only explain 22.37% of the effect on income inequality in Indonesia. The rest is influenced by factors outside the model.

show abstract

“… Blinder and Esaki (), Castañeda, Diaz‐Giménez, and Ríos‐Rull (), Cysne and Turchick (), Jantti (), Mocan (), and Volscho (). …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Monetary authority's transparency and income inequality

Mendonça

Esteves²

2018

Review Development Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper analyzes how transparency from the monetary authority can affect the income inequality. The contribution is twofold. In the first part, we develop a theoretical model that considers heterogenous agent shopping-time economy with a lack of transaction technology between rich and poor to observe the effect of central bank transparency on income inequality. The second part provides empirical evidence through panel data methodology that draws on 37 developing countries for the period 1992 to 2012. Our findings indicate that, in general, the monetary authority's transparency is an important tool to reduce income inequality between rich and poor when there are some advantages for the first group.

show abstract

Equilibrium unemployment-inequality correlation

Cited by 15 publications

References 23 publications

Joint Determinants of Monetary, Macroeconomic, Social and Income Inequality

Joint Determinants of Monetary, Macroeconomic, Social and Income Inequality

Pengaruh Pendidikan, Pengangguran, dan Kemiskinan terhadap Ketimpangan Pendapatan di Indonesia

Monetary authority's transparency and income inequality

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About