Volume 1: Offshore Technology; Offshore Geotechnics 2016
DOI: 10.1115/omae2016-54377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equilibrium Scour Prediction for Uniform and Non-Uniform Cylindrical Structures Under Clear Water Conditions

Abstract: Offshore Gravity Base Foundations (GBFs) are often designed with non-uniform cylindrical geometries. Such structures interact with the local hydrodynamics which amplify the adverse dynamic pressure gradient, which is responsible for all flow and scour phenomena including the bed shear stress amplification. In this study a method for predicting the effect non-uniform cylindrical structure geometries have on local scour around offshore structures under the forcing of a unidirectional current is presented. The in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between experimental and numerical results is small enough to be attribured to the slightly different flow profiles that were present in each case. To verify this, the scour prediction correction factor of Tavouktsoglou et al (2016) is applied to the simulation data. Table 2 provides a summary of the data used in this analysis: In the data above < > is the depth-averaged pressure gradient and can be calculated using the method outlined in Tavouktsoglou et al (2016), and is the resulting correction factor.…”
Section: Application Of Correction Factor To Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference between experimental and numerical results is small enough to be attribured to the slightly different flow profiles that were present in each case. To verify this, the scour prediction correction factor of Tavouktsoglou et al (2016) is applied to the simulation data. Table 2 provides a summary of the data used in this analysis: In the data above < > is the depth-averaged pressure gradient and can be calculated using the method outlined in Tavouktsoglou et al (2016), and is the resulting correction factor.…”
Section: Application Of Correction Factor To Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To verify this, the scour prediction correction factor of Tavouktsoglou et al (2016) is applied to the simulation data. Table 2 provides a summary of the data used in this analysis: In the data above < > is the depth-averaged pressure gradient and can be calculated using the method outlined in Tavouktsoglou et al (2016), and is the resulting correction factor. From Table 2 it can be seen that the difference of between the simulated and measured cases is 90%.…”
Section: Application Of Correction Factor To Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%