2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10509-012-1029-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equilibrium points and stability in the restricted three-body problem with oblateness and variable masses

Abstract: The existence and stability of a test particle around the equilibrium points in the restricted three-body problem is generalized to include the effect of variations in oblateness of the first primary, small perturbations and given in the Coriolis and centrifugal forces α and β respectively, and radiation pressure of the second primary; in the case when the primaries vary their masses with time in accordance with the combined Meshcherskii law. For the autonomized system, we use a numerical evidence to compute t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, we may say that these two exits act as hoses connecting the interior region of the system where x(L 3 ) ≤ x ≤ x(L 2 ) with the "outside world" of the exterior region. The position of the Lagrangian points as well as the critical values of the energy are functions of the oblateness coefficient A 1 (e.g., Singh & Leke (2012)). In Table 1 we provide the location of the Lagrangian points and the critical values of the total orbital energy when A 1 = {0, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1}.…”
Section: Details Of the Dynamical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, we may say that these two exits act as hoses connecting the interior region of the system where x(L 3 ) ≤ x ≤ x(L 2 ) with the "outside world" of the exterior region. The position of the Lagrangian points as well as the critical values of the energy are functions of the oblateness coefficient A 1 (e.g., Singh & Leke (2012)). In Table 1 we provide the location of the Lagrangian points and the critical values of the total orbital energy when A 1 = {0, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1}.…”
Section: Details Of the Dynamical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The oblateness or triaxiality of a celestial body can produce perturbation deviations from the two-body motion. The study of oblateness coefficient includes the series of works of Beevi & Sharma (2012); Markellos et al (1996Markellos et al ( , 2002; Kalantonis et al (2005Kalantonis et al ( , 2006Kalantonis et al ( , 2008; Kalvouridis & Gousidou-Koutita (2012); Perdiou et al (2012); Sharma & Subba Rao (1979, 1986; Subba Rao & Sharma (1988Sharma ( , 1997; Sharma (1981Sharma ( , 1987Sharma ( , 1989Sharma ( , 1990; Singh & Leke (2012 by considering the more massive primary as an oblate spheroid with its equatorial plane co-incident with the plane of motion of the primaries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Celestial bodies in the general restricted three-body problem are assumed to be spherical, but in nature, several celestial bodies have observed the significant effects of oblateness of their bodies [1,2,3,4,5], have observed the significant effects of oblateness of the bodies. The restricted three-body problem withoblateness of the primaries have received tremendous attention, specifically in the two and three-dimensional cases with respect to its five co-planar equilibrium points ( = 1, … ,5): The points 1 , 2 , 3 lying on the line joining the primaries are called collinear equilibrium points, while the points 4 , 5 forming the triangle with the line joining the primaries are called triangular points.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To incorporate the particular shape of the two main bodies into the equations explaining the motion of the test body (e.g., comet, asteroid, or spacecraft), the oblateness (or prolateness) parameter has been introduced and used initially in Sharma & Subba Rao (1975). From then, a large amount of research work has been devoted to the study of the influence of the oblateness (Kalantonis et al 2005, 2006, 2008; Markellos et al 1996, 2000; Perdiou et al 2012; Safiya Beevi & Sharma 2012; Sharma 1980, 1989; Sharma 2012; Singh & Leke 2012, 2013; Zotos 2015, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%