2016
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2014.2140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equilibrium Innovation Ecosystems: The Dark Side of Collaborating with Complementors

Abstract: The recent years have exhibited a burst in the amount of collaborative activities among …rms selling complementary products. This paper aims at providing a ra- for their respective components in a noncooperative manner. In equilibrium, …rms end up forming as many collaboration ties as it is possible, although they would all prefer a scenario where collaboration were forbidden. In addition, a social planner would also prefer such a scenario to the one arising in equilibrium. We show that the result that collabo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our process model of evolving ecosystem dynamics (Figure ) also highlights the importance of framing – effective on the part of the disruptor, ineffective on the part of the incumbent – as an important force in shaping ecosystems in addition to patents or licensing fees (Gawer, ), standardization of procedures and interfaces (Wareham et al, ), the oversight of the quality and number of complementors (Mantovani and Ruiz‐Aliseda, ), or dynamic control (Dattée et al, ). Yet, the framing process contains the seeds of its own destruction: strong framing helps the disruptor shape the ecosystem around its BMI, but over time it might degenerate into a vicious cycle if not accompanied by continuous BM adaptation by the ecosystem‐central firm.…”
Section: Discussion: the Contributions Of Our Studymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Our process model of evolving ecosystem dynamics (Figure ) also highlights the importance of framing – effective on the part of the disruptor, ineffective on the part of the incumbent – as an important force in shaping ecosystems in addition to patents or licensing fees (Gawer, ), standardization of procedures and interfaces (Wareham et al, ), the oversight of the quality and number of complementors (Mantovani and Ruiz‐Aliseda, ), or dynamic control (Dattée et al, ). Yet, the framing process contains the seeds of its own destruction: strong framing helps the disruptor shape the ecosystem around its BMI, but over time it might degenerate into a vicious cycle if not accompanied by continuous BM adaptation by the ecosystem‐central firm.…”
Section: Discussion: the Contributions Of Our Studymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Notions from the innovation ecosystems literature highlights the significance of technological co-dependency and product complementarity on system development (e.g. Adner, 2006;Holmström Olsson and Bosch, 2014;Mantovani and Ruiz-Aliseda, 2016;Mercan and Göktas, 2011). This study indicates that the context of new technologies, especially regarding medical technologies, has a strong impact on system-building and market formation strategies of innovative actors (Kukk et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the strategic impact of data sharing on the competition between CPs is a priori unclear: although additional data may increase the firms' ability to price discriminate (see Fudenberg and Villas-Boas 2012) and to personalize (Ansari and Mela 2003), the business stealing effect, due to the competitors' access to the firm's exclusive resources, may outweigh the benefits. In this spirit, Mantovani and Ruiz-Aliseda (2016) analyze the effects of collaboration between firms producing complementary products, and show that collaboration may lead to a prisoner's dilemma outcome.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%