2006
DOI: 10.1257/aer.96.4.1367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equilibrium Incentives in Oligopoly: Corrigendum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
419
2
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 359 publications
(435 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
12
419
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The agent's payment depends on a linear combination of the firm's profit and returns. The same assumption has been made by Fershtmann/Judd (1987). It is the most striking result of these two papers that it optimal for principals to offers rewards which are contingent on a linear combination of profit and returns.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 84%
“…The agent's payment depends on a linear combination of the firm's profit and returns. The same assumption has been made by Fershtmann/Judd (1987). It is the most striking result of these two papers that it optimal for principals to offers rewards which are contingent on a linear combination of profit and returns.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 84%
“…The results presented in this paper can also be compared to the well known (and opposite) result [Vickers (1985), Fershtman and Judd (1987), Sklivas (1987)] that under Cournot oligopoly the presence of managers'incentives related to sales can induce each company to behave less collusively than simple entrepreneurial …rms (i.e., which managed by just the owner).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The solution concept used to solve the game is a standard subgame Nash equilibrium. 3 An equilibrium of the game is thus a vector of Nash equilibrium quantities y 1 (v (n + k)) ; y 2 (v (n + k)) ; :::; y n+k (v (n + k)) , where v is every manager's equilibrium remuneration and k is the number of new entrants that have entered the market in equilibrium.…”
Section: The Structure Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delegation, therefore, substitutes for a formal incentive contract. 12 The preferred agent values quality more, the more severe the quality e¤ects of cost reductions are. The preferred agent also values quality more, when is higher.…”
Section: Delegation Under Mandatory Inhouse Provisionmentioning
confidence: 99%