Abstract:T here exist capital constraints in many distribution channels. We examine a channel consisting of one manufacturer and one retailer, where the retailer is capital constrained. The retailer may fund its business by borrowing credit either from a competitive bank market or from the manufacturer, provided the latter is willing to lend. When only one credit type (either bank or trade credit) is viable, we show that trade credit financing generally charges a higher wholesale price and thus becomes less attractive … Show more
“…Jing et al [14] found that the overall supply chain efficiency under trade credit financing is higher than that under bank credit financing when production cost is low. However, our result shows that the trade credit financing cannot effectively increase the supply chain's efficiency under a low-carbon environment.…”
Abstract:With the significant increase of fossil energy consumption and the ever-worsening pollution of environment, low-carbon development becomes an inevitable choice. Carbon finance can help firms alleviate the finance pressure from carbon emission reduction. This research explores two financing methods, delay-in-payment and bank loan; and two cooperation decisions, carbon emission reduction cooperation and price cooperation. Four scenarios are considered: non-cooperation, partial-cooperation delay-in-payment, supply chain carbon finance (SCCF), and full-cooperation. We discuss how firms make their pricing and carbon emission reduction decisions under different cooperative levels and financing methods. For a manufacturer-dominated supply chain, the results show that SCCF will help the small and medium enterprise seek cooperation with the monopoly manufacturer, and improve supply chain's profit compared to green loan. What's more, SCCF pattern can effectively control the total carbon emission. In addition, we extend the model to consider the retailer-dominated case. The results show that SCCF pattern can help increase the emission reduction rate of the whole supply chain. From the perspective of emission reduction efficiency, it is better for the government to promote the SCCF mode in the retailer-dominated supply chain.
“…Jing et al [14] found that the overall supply chain efficiency under trade credit financing is higher than that under bank credit financing when production cost is low. However, our result shows that the trade credit financing cannot effectively increase the supply chain's efficiency under a low-carbon environment.…”
Abstract:With the significant increase of fossil energy consumption and the ever-worsening pollution of environment, low-carbon development becomes an inevitable choice. Carbon finance can help firms alleviate the finance pressure from carbon emission reduction. This research explores two financing methods, delay-in-payment and bank loan; and two cooperation decisions, carbon emission reduction cooperation and price cooperation. Four scenarios are considered: non-cooperation, partial-cooperation delay-in-payment, supply chain carbon finance (SCCF), and full-cooperation. We discuss how firms make their pricing and carbon emission reduction decisions under different cooperative levels and financing methods. For a manufacturer-dominated supply chain, the results show that SCCF will help the small and medium enterprise seek cooperation with the monopoly manufacturer, and improve supply chain's profit compared to green loan. What's more, SCCF pattern can effectively control the total carbon emission. In addition, we extend the model to consider the retailer-dominated case. The results show that SCCF pattern can help increase the emission reduction rate of the whole supply chain. From the perspective of emission reduction efficiency, it is better for the government to promote the SCCF mode in the retailer-dominated supply chain.
“…As an integrated part of a supply chain contract, trade credit can act as a risk-sharing mechanism among supply chain members [17]. Jing et al [18] compared the efficiency between bank credit financing and trade credit financing for a capital-constrained retailer and found that trade credit financing becomes highly effective when production cost is relatively low. Chen [19] further studied the coordination problem in the supply chain.…”
Section: Interface Of Operations and Financing Decisionsmentioning
Capital constraints exist in many supply chains. We examine a low carbon distribution channel that consists of a manufacturer and a retailer, in which the retailer is constrained by capital. The retailer can be financed by bank credit from a competitive bank market. A Stackelberg model is developed to analyze the integrated decision-making process of ordering, financing, and emission reduction. By comparing the decentralized and centralized channels, we obtain that the manufacturer's green technology investment should be linearly proportional to the retailer's order quantity in both channels. Thus, a large order quantity leads to increased efforts to reduce emissions. Results further show that the centralized channel in some cases has fewer emissions and can generate more profits for the whole supply chain compared with the decentralized channel. We therefore propose a revenue sharing contract with a function form to coordinate the distribution channel. When the government allocates appropriate quotas to the supply chain, high carbon price can benefit the environment and supply chain efficiency.
“…Chen and Wang (2012) investigate the impacts of limited liability for the performance of SCF and shows that limited liability accounts for the reason why the retailer with a lower initial budget initiates a higher ordering level under trade credit contract [3]. Jing et al, (2012) discuss the equilibrium in SCF with two credit choices (bank or trade credit) and show that bank credit financing generally charges a lower wholesale price and thus becomes more attractive than trade credit financing for the retailer [4]. Zhang (2011) considered a multi-product newsboy problem with both supplier quantity discounts and a budget constraint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the convention in the bank credit literature, we assume the bank market is competitive and that the risk-neutral banks have access to unlimited funds at the risk-free interest rate f R , which is normalized to zero without loss of generality [4], [8], [9]. We also consider the perfect capital market without taxes, transaction costs and bankruptcy costs.…”
Abstract-In this paper, we design a supply chain finance system composed of a capital-constrained retailer, a manufacturer and a commercial bank, with unknown demand distribution. Considering the retailer's capital-constraint degree, credit line and bankruptcy risk, we establish a Stackelberg game in which the manufacturer acts as the leader and the commercial bank as the sub-leader. Based on the profit-maximization objective, we solve the optimal order of the retailer, the optimal interest rate of the commercial bank and the optimal wholesale price of the manufacturer and the robust deviation for each participant based on minimize-maximum-regret. Finally, we conduct numerical examples to make a comparative analysis between these two different decisions and explore the impact of the demand uncertainties on optimal strategies and robust deviations. It concluded that the robust decision provides a conservative strategy for risk aversion and the region of demand intervals has great impact on robust deviations, rather than the optimal decisions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.