2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equilibrium Cu isotope fractionation in copper minerals: a first-principles study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 157 publications
4
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, coordination data and bond lengths obtained from EXAFS analyses can correlate with the final Cu isotope composition (Pokrovsky et al, 2008). The adsorption of Cu onto various inorganic surfaces results in different changes of bond lengths and/or "stiffness" of bonds, and it can be speculated that, consequently, in different extents of isotope fractionation, i.e., 1.85-2.05 Å for goethite, hematite, lepidocrocite, boehmite, kaolinite, quartz (e.g., Boudesocque et al, 2007;Lin et al, 2004;Parkman et al, 1999;Peacock & Sherman, 2005;Weesner & Bleam, 1997), which is in accordance with the average calculated and measured Cu-O bond lengths in various Cu minerals (1.88-2.03 Å and 1.85-1.99 Å, respectively; Liu et al, 2021).…”
Section: Cu Complexationsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…However, coordination data and bond lengths obtained from EXAFS analyses can correlate with the final Cu isotope composition (Pokrovsky et al, 2008). The adsorption of Cu onto various inorganic surfaces results in different changes of bond lengths and/or "stiffness" of bonds, and it can be speculated that, consequently, in different extents of isotope fractionation, i.e., 1.85-2.05 Å for goethite, hematite, lepidocrocite, boehmite, kaolinite, quartz (e.g., Boudesocque et al, 2007;Lin et al, 2004;Parkman et al, 1999;Peacock & Sherman, 2005;Weesner & Bleam, 1997), which is in accordance with the average calculated and measured Cu-O bond lengths in various Cu minerals (1.88-2.03 Å and 1.85-1.99 Å, respectively; Liu et al, 2021).…”
Section: Cu Complexationsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…We adopt a force constant of 54 ± 27 N m −1 for Cu in silicate melt, with the caveat that a slightly higher force constant might be expected in natural samples given our overestimate of the bond length, but we expect the true value to be within the error of the value given here. Liu et al (2021) calculated the β-factors of a variety of Cu-bearing minerals. For Cu + -bearing minerals, they reported force constants between 54 and 135 N m −1 , but all those minerals are either sulfides or oxides.…”
Section: Coppermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the most common valence state of Cu hosted by sulfide in basaltic rocks is Cu + (e.g., Lee et al., 2012), oxidizing Cu + to Cu 2+ during sulfide dissolution could release isotopically heavy Cu to fluids, leaving the altered basalts isotopically lighter than the primary basalts. This has been verified by laboratory experiments and first‐principles calculation (Fernandez & Borrok, 2009; S. Liu et al., 2021; Mathur et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2021). Copper oxidation during sulfide dissolution could therefore account for the lower Cu content and isotopic values at the altered rims than in the core (J. Huang et al., 2016), also consistent with the lower sulfide content in the altered rims than in the core (Figure 3c).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…As alteration proceeds, a concentration gradient between the edges and the interior of the basalt possibly resulted in concentration‐driven diffusion in the basalt. The oxidation of Cu + to Cu 2+ during sulfide dissolution, as mentioned above, prefers to release isotopically heavy Cu to fluids (Fernandez & Borrok, 2009; J. Huang et al., 2016; S. Liu et al., 2021; Mathur et al., 2005), thereby altering the edges of basalt and decreasing δ 65 Cu values there. The decreasing δ 65 Cu values with low Cu contents were previously reported in altered oceanic crust at Integrated Ocean Drilling Program Site 1,256 (J. Huang et al., 2016) and Alpine oceanic metagabbros (Busigny et al., 2018), and attributed to the oxidative breakdown of sulfide on the seafloor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%