“…Therefore, pM values were calculated for the Fe and Al complexes with the ligands under study and are depicted on Table 2, together with the corresponding values for a set of synthetic and biological ligands, namely, polyhydroxypyridinone-based ligands, such as hexadentate 3,2-HP (tripodal Tren(Me-3,2-HOPO) (Tren = tris(2-aminoethyl)amine, Me-3,2-HOPO = 1-methyl-3,2-hydroxypyridinone), [24] linear 3,4-LI(Me-3,2-HOPO) (3,4-LI = N 1 -(3-aminopropyl)butane-1,4-diamine), [25] a hexadentate tripodal 3,4-HP (CP254), [26] tetradentate 3,4-HP (IDAA C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (3,4-HP) 2 (IDA = iminodiacetic acid), [27] EDTAA C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (3,4-HP) 2 [12] ), and some well known non-hydroxypyridinone strong synthetic chelators such as N,N'-bis(2-hydroxybenzyl)ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetic acid (HBED), [28] EDTA, [29] DTPA = diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid, [29] desferrioxamine (DFO), [30,31] DFP, [19] and the endogenous ligand, transferrin. [30,32] Analysis reveals that the herein developed hexadentate chelators are more potent than the others, except HBED, reported in Table 2 towards iron. Thus, the high metal chelating affinity revealed by these novel hexadentate hydroxypyridinones undoubtedly constitutes a strong motivating factor for pursuing biodistribution studies with both ligands to evaluate their removal capacity towards hard metal ions.…”